Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Considerations before rhinoplasty.

A J Correa1, J M Sykes, W R Ries

  • 1Chief Resident, Vanderbilt Bill Wilkerson Center for Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America
|April 10, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The decomposition of branch-wood in the canopy and floor of a mixed deciduous woodland.

Oecologia·2017
Same author

Laser treatment of cutaneous vascular tumors and malformations.

Facial plastic surgery clinics of North America·2011
Same author

A comparison of MR-based attenuation correction in PET versus SPECT.

Physics in medicine and biology·2011
Same author

Surgical rejuvenation of the brow and forehead.

Facial plastic surgery : FPS·2002
Same author

Subtotal nasal reconstruction using a bi valved paramedian forehead flap.

Facial plastic surgery : FPS·2002
Same author

Nonoperative techniques for scar management and revision.

Facial plastic surgery : FPS·2001
Same journal

Little Tube; Big Problems: Eustachian Tube Dysfunction.

Otolaryngologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Current State of Button Battery Ingestion Injuries.

Otolaryngologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Diagnostic Algorithm for Eustachian Tube Dysfunction and Indications for Balloon Dilation of the Eustachian Tube.

Otolaryngologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Patulous Eustachian Tube Dysfunction.

Otolaryngologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Revisiting Eustachian Tube Anatomy and Physiology.

Otolaryngologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Glottic Stenosis.

Otolaryngologic clinics of North America·2026
See all related articles

Selecting patients for facial aesthetic surgery requires evaluating psychological factors beyond anatomy. Understanding patient motivations and expectations is crucial for successful outcomes and managing post-operative satisfaction.

Area of Science:

  • Plastic Surgery
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Patient selection for aesthetic facial surgery, especially rhinoplasty, extends beyond anatomical considerations.
  • Psychological assessment is vital for identifying suitable candidates who can tolerate surgical stress.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To emphasize the importance of psychological evaluation in selecting patients for aesthetic facial surgery.
  • To outline key aspects of patient interviews and consultations for assessing psychological stability.

Main Methods:

  • Structured patient interviews to gather information on motivations, expectations, and ego strength.
  • Consideration of psychiatric consultation when potential psychiatric illness is indicated.
  • Preoperative patient education to manage expectations and improve postoperative outcomes.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Thorough psychological assessment improves candidate selection for rhinoplasty and other facial surgeries.
  • Effective communication and expectation management reduce postoperative dissatisfaction.
  • Addressing patient concerns non-defensively is key to managing dissatisfaction.

Conclusions:

  • Successful aesthetic facial surgery requires a comprehensive evaluation of a patient's psychological and emotional state.
  • Investing time in preoperative patient education and communication significantly enhances postoperative results.
  • A non-defensive approach to patient concerns is essential for managing dissatisfaction and improving overall patient experience.