Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bone classification: clinical-histomorphometric comparison.

P Trisi1, W Rao

  • 1Biomaterials Clinical Research Association, Pescara, Italy. paulbioc@tin.it

Clinical Oral Implants Research
|April 10, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Nano liquid metal for the preparation of a thermally conductive and electrically insulating material with high stability.

RSC advances·2022
Same author

[Retrospective analysis of cuffed-tunneled catheters in pediatric patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis].

Zhonghua er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of pediatrics·2018
Same author

SiRNA interfering STAT3 enhances DDP sensitivity in cervical cancer cells.

European review for medical and pharmacological sciences·2018
Same author

Twinning-induced plasticity (TWIP) and work hardening in Ti-based metallic glass matrix composites.

Scientific reports·2017
Same author

The Reed-Stanton press rig for the generation of reproducible fingermarks: Towards a standardised methodology for fingermark research.

Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society·2016
Same author

Scaffolding protein Homer1a protects against NMDA-induced neuronal injury.

Cell death & disease·2015
Same journal

Evaluation of the Adjunctive Use of Er:YAG Laser or Erythritol Air-Polishing in the Non-Surgical Treatment of Peri-Implantitis: A Pilot RCT.

Clinical oral implants research·2026
Same journal

A 3-Year Split-Mouth Randomized Non-Inferiority Controlled Trial Comparing Cement-Retained Monolithic CAD-CAM Zirconia and Lithium Disilicate Crowns for Single Posterior Implant Restorations.

Clinical oral implants research·2026
Same journal

Block Versus Particulate Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral for Guided Bone Regeneration of Peri-Implant Dehiscence Defects: A 5-Year Randomized Controlled Trial.

Clinical oral implants research·2026
Same journal

Adjunctive Electrolytic Implant Surface Decontamination in the Reconstructive Surgical Treatment of Peri-Implantitis-A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Clinical oral implants research·2026
Same journal

A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing a One-Piece Zirconia Tissue-Level Implant and Two-Piece Titanium Bone-Level Implant for Maxillary Single Tooth Replacement-3 year Results.

Clinical oral implants research·2026
Same journal

Effect of Implant Design on Fracture Resistance, Mode, and Crystal Structure of One- and Two-Piece Zirconia Implants With Ceramic or Titanium Abutment Screws: An In Vitro Study.

Clinical oral implants research·2026
See all related articles

Hand-felt bone quality assessment during oral implant surgery can reliably distinguish between very dense (D1) and very porous (D4) bone. However, this tactile method struggles to differentiate intermediate bone densities (D2 and D3).

Area of Science:

  • Oral Surgery
  • Biomaterials Science
  • Dental Implantology

Background:

  • Accurate assessment of bone quality is crucial for successful dental implant placement.
  • Clinical evaluation of bone density often relies on tactile feedback during osteotomy preparation.
  • Histomorphometric analysis provides a quantitative measure of bone structure and density.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To correlate the clinical, hand-felt assessment of bone quality with its histological structure.
  • To evaluate the reliability of tactile bone density scoring (D1-D4) against histomorphometric data.
  • To determine the statistical significance of distinguishing bone classes based on drilling resistance.

Main Methods:

  • Bone biopsies (n=56) were collected during oral implant surgery.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Bone quality was clinically scored based on hand-felt drilling resistance (D1-D4).
  • Histomorphometric analysis quantified bone density as the percentage of bony trabeculae.

    • Main Results:

    • Mean histomorphometric bone density: D1 (76.54%), D2 (66.78%), D3 (59.61%), D4 (28.28%).
    • Statistically significant differences were found between D1 and D4 bone classes (P=0.01, P=0.0006).
    • No significant difference was observed between D2 and D3 bone classes (P=0.6, P=0.4).

    Conclusions:

    • Hand-felt assessment reliably distinguishes between the extremes of bone density (D1 and D4).
    • Tactile assessment is insufficient for differentiating intermediate bone quality classes (D2 and D3).
    • Further refinement of clinical assessment methods for intermediate bone densities is warranted for implant dentistry.