Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Haptic underestimation of angular extent.

S Lakatos1, L E Marks

  • 1John B Pierce Laboratory, New Haven, CT 06519, USA. lakatos@vancouver.wsu.edu

Perception
|April 10, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The perplexing plurality of psychophysical processes.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2014
Same author

Platelet adhesion and fibrinogen deposition in murine microvessels upon inhalation of nanosized carbon particles.

Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH·2010
Same author

Anxiety sensitivity and auditory perception of heartbeat.

Behaviour research and therapy·2006
Same author

Valid across-group comparisons with labeled scales: the gLMS versus magnitude matching.

Physiology & behavior·2004
Same author

Azurophil granules are heterogeneous with respect to mobilization induced by different concentrations of fMLP.

Haematologia·2002
Same author

fMLP-induced respiratory burst and the intracellular Ca2+ signal are not interrelated in neutrophils.

Haematologia·2001
Same journal

Predictive models and parameter analysis for multiple tactile perceptions in skin-wet fabrics interface.

Perception·2026
Same journal

High-resolution kitsch by AI: Why society needs art, not more AI content.

Perception·2026
Same journal

Benchmarking spatial discrimination thresholds of two-frame motion defined forms compared to luminance and stereoscopic defined forms.

Perception·2026
Same journal

The effect of face masks on the perception of trustworthiness and competence in individuals with autistic traits.

Perception·2026
Same journal

The importance of external features for categorizing ethnicity: can Koreans identify Korean, Japanese, and Chinese faces?

Perception·2026
Same journal

Interoception, alexithymia, and motor congruency: Psychological drivers of body ownership in virtual reality.

Perception·2026
See all related articles

Individuals consistently underestimate angles felt by touch compared to sight. However, matching tactile estimates to visual input suggests vision can recalibrate touch perception, though visual cues alone didn't fully resolve this underestimation.

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Perception

Background:

  • Understanding the accuracy of tactile perception is crucial for fields like robotics and prosthetics.
  • Comparing haptic (touch) and visual judgments reveals differences in sensory processing.
  • The recalibration of one sensory system by another is a key area in cross-modal research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify the accuracy of estimating angles using only touch.
  • To compare haptic angle estimation with visual judgment.
  • To investigate how visual input influences tactile angle perception.

Main Methods:

  • Nine experiments were conducted using tactile stimuli (wooden blocks, raised contours) and visual stimuli.
  • Participants estimated angle sizes under various haptic and visual conditions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Haptic-visual matching tasks and varying visual cue conditions were employed.

    • Main Results:

    • Tactile angle estimation consistently underestimated actual angles compared to visual baselines.
    • Underestimation magnitude was inversely related to the actual angle size.
    • Haptic-visual matching eliminated underestimation, suggesting visual recalibration, but visual cues alone did not significantly reduce haptic underestimation.

    Conclusions:

    • Haptic underestimation of angles is a robust finding across different tactile contexts.
    • Visual input can recalibrate the haptic system's internal metric for angle estimation.
    • The precise nature of visual information that recalibrates touch remains an open question.