Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Risk-adjusted outcome models for public mental health outpatient programs.

M S Hendryx1, D G Dyck, D Srebnik

  • 1Washington Institute for Mental Illness Research and Training, Washington State University, Spokane 99201, USA.

Health Services Research
|April 14, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Science and regulation. Mountaintop mining consequences.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2010
Same author

An examination of methods for risk-adjustment of rehospitalization rates.

Mental health services research·2001
Same author

Introduction: risk-adjustment issues in mental health services.

The journal of behavioral health services & research·2001
Same author

Comparing alternative risk-adjustment models.

The journal of behavioral health services & research·2001
Same author

Access to mental health services and health sector social capital.

Administration and policy in mental health·2001
Same author

A test of the reliability and validity of the Multnomah Community Ability Scale.

Community mental health journal·2001
Same journal

Engaging Families in Pediatric Care Management: A Qualitative Study From the North Carolina Integrated Care for Kids Model.

Health services research·2026
Same journal

The Effect of Hospital-Physician Vertical Integration on Utilization-Driven Changes in Healthcare Spending for an All-Payer Population With Multiple Chronic Conditions.

Health services research·2026
Same journal

The Association Between Sepsis Coding and Payment to U.S. Hospitals.

Health services research·2026
Same journal

Stagnation in Achieving Recommended Methadone Doses in Opioid Use Disorder Treatment.

Health services research·2026
Same journal

Promoting Transplant Access Through Dialysis Facility Performance Metrics: A Double-Edged Sword.

Health services research·2026
Same journal

Understanding Medicaid Estate Recovery: The Experience of North Carolina and Policy Implications for Future Reforms.

Health services research·2026
See all related articles

Risk-adjustment models for mental health services predict client outcomes using client and case manager data. Adjusting for risk significantly alters how public mental health agency performance is ranked, impacting quality monitoring.

Area of Science:

  • Mental Health Services Research
  • Health Outcomes Research
  • Health Services Administration

Background:

  • Publicly funded mental health outpatient settings require effective methods for assessing client outcomes.
  • Existing outcome assessment tools may not adequately account for client-specific risk factors.
  • Developing robust risk-adjustment models is crucial for fair performance evaluation and quality improvement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate risk-adjustment outcome models for publicly funded mental health outpatient settings.
  • To predict client functional status, health-related quality of life, and satisfaction with services.
  • To examine the impact of risk adjustment on comparative agency performance.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective risk models were developed using demographic, diagnostic, client-reported, and case manager rating data.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Linear regression analyses were employed to test model specifications.
  • Models were validated on a separate sample, and comparative agency performance was assessed.

    • Main Results:

    • Severe diagnoses, substance abuse, client age, and baseline functional status/quality of life predicted mental health outcomes.
    • Risk-adjusted scores led to different rankings of agency performance compared to unadjusted scores.
    • The predictive accuracy of the developed models requires further research.

    Conclusions:

    • Risk-adjusted outcome models for functional status and patient satisfaction are feasible in public mental health outpatient programs.
    • Risk adjustment significantly influences the assessment of comparative agency performance, with implications for quality monitoring.
    • Further research is needed to enhance predictive accuracy and develop practical applications for risk-adjustment techniques in mental health settings.