Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026

A Finite Element Approach for Locating the Center of Resistance of Maxillary Teeth
Published on: April 8, 2020
Differences in cephalometric reference values between five centres: relevance to the Eurocleft Study
M J Trenouth1, G Laitung, A J Naftel
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Royal Preston Hospital, Lancashire, UK.
Abstract:
Cephalometric data from five different geographical areas (Oslo, Manchester, London, Nijmegen, and Michigan) were compared. The angles SNA, SNB, and ANB were taken from published tables in the form of mean, standard deviation (SD) and number in the sample, divided up by age and sex. Angles SNA and SNB were significantly different among centres on univariate analysis. The Oslo data showed 23 instances in which they differed significantly from the other data, London 16, Manchester 11, Nijmegen 11, and Michigan 7. Multivariate analysis using Penrose distances were Oslo (2.04), Manchester (1.39), London (0.93), Nijmegen (0.80), and Michigan (0.66). The sums of the Mahalanobis distances were Nijmegen (3.60), Oslo (3.10), London (2.80), Manchester (2.25), and Michigan (1.49). As these results probably reflect racial and genetic differences, these must be taken into account when international comparisons are being made, as in the Eurocleft study.
More Related Videos
10:23Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans
Published on: September 8, 2023
08:03Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model
Published on: November 4, 2025