Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The extraction of information from visual persistence.

D E Erwin

    The American Journal of Psychology
    |December 1, 1976
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Visual persistence is an active process, not a passive neural copy. This study found that reportability of visual information decreased when the stimulus duration matched visual persistence, suggesting an active, ongoing mechanism.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Data mining in the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS): early detection of intussusception and other events after rotavirus vaccination.

    Vaccine·2001
    Same author

    Further evidence for two components in visual persistence.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·1976
    Same author

    Effects of age and stimulus repetition on two-choice reaction time.

    Journal of gerontology·1973
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Psychology
    • Neuroscience
    • Visual Perception

    Background:

    • Visual persistence describes the perceived duration of a visual stimulus.
    • Understanding the underlying mechanisms of visual persistence is crucial for visual cognition.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate whether visual persistence is an active or passive process.
    • To determine the role of continuous stimulus-masking on reportability.

    Main Methods:

    • Participants viewed seven-letter targets flashed for 50 msec.
    • Two conditions followed: a blank adapting field or continuous target-mask cycles.
    • Reportability of target information was assessed in both conditions.

    Main Results:

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Reportability was 50% lower when target duration matched estimated visual persistence with continuous masking.
  • This suggests that the active process of visual persistence is disrupted by continuous masking.

    • Conclusions:

    • Visual persistence operates as an active, continuously functioning process.
    • It is not merely a passive neural representation of the stimulus.