Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cytoskeletal Coordination in Cell Migration01:32

Cytoskeletal Coordination in Cell Migration

A migrating cell changes its shape during the cyclic events of attachment and detachment from the substratum and repositions the cell organelles correspondingly. These complex events are orchestrated by the dynamic cytoskeletal network comprising actin filaments, intermediate filaments, and microtubules. Cytoskeletal crosstalk — the direct and indirect communication between the different components — is crucial for this coordination. Direct communication involves various linker proteins that...
Overview of Cell-Matrix Interactions01:24

Overview of Cell-Matrix Interactions

The extracellular matrix or ECM holds cells together to form a tissue and allows the cells within the tissue to communicate. ECM comprises proteins such as fibronectin, collagen, laminin, etc. The most abundant protein in this space is collagen. Collagen fibers are interwoven with carbohydrate-containing protein molecules called proteoglycans. ECM allows cell migration and provides a structural scaffold at cell adhesion that anchors the cell when the extracellular matrix proteins interact with...
Integrins01:10

Integrins

Animal and protozoan cells do not have cell walls to help maintain shape and provide structural stability. Instead, these eukaryotic cells secrete a sticky mass of carbohydrates and proteins into the spaces between adjacent cells. This network of proteins and molecules is called an extracellular matrix or ECM.
Some ECM proteins assemble into a basement membrane to which the remaining components adhere. Proteoglycans typically form the bulk of the ECM while fibrous proteins, like collagen,...
Activation of Integrins01:15

Activation of Integrins

Integrins bind ligands and transmit information from outside the cell to inside or vice-versa through an "outside-in signaling" or "inside-out signaling."
In "outside-in signaling," external factors in the extracellular space bind to exposed ligand binding sites on integrins. This causes the inactive protein to undergo a conformational change to become active. Integrins are often clustered on the cell membrane. Repetitive and regularly spaced ligand binding events provide an effective stimulus.
Intracellular Signaling Affects Focal Adhesions01:17

Intracellular Signaling Affects Focal Adhesions

Integrins act both as extracellular input receivers and as intracellular processing activators. As their name suggests, integrins are entirely integrated into the membrane structure. Their hydrophobic membrane-spanning regions interact with the phospholipid bilayer's hydrophobic region. These membrane receptors provide extracellular attachment sites for effectors like hormones and growth factors. They activate intracellular response cascades when their effectors are bound and active.
Some...
Anchoring Junctions01:03

Anchoring Junctions

Anchoring junctions are multiprotein complexes that help cells connect to other cells and the extracellular matrix. Anchoring junctions are present on the lateral and basal surfaces of cells, providing strong and flexible connections. Focal adhesions are often formed due to cell interactions with the ECM substrata, which initiate signal transduction via kinase cascades and other mechanisms. Together, they provide stability and tissue integrity. There are three types of anchoring junctions:...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Using magnets and magnetic beads to dissect signaling pathways activated by mechanical tension applied to cells.

Methods (San Diego, Calif.)·2015
Same author

Regulation of RhoA activity by adhesion molecules and mechanotransduction.

Current molecular medicine·2014
Same author

Mutant B-RAF regulates a Rac-dependent cadherin switch in melanoma.

Oncogene·2012
Same author

Antithrombotic phosphoinositide 3-kinase β inhibitors in humans: a 'shear' delight!

Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH·2012
Same author

Endothelial cell junctions and the regulation of vascular permeability and leukocyte transmigration.

Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH·2008
Same author

Focal adhesion assembly.

Trends in cell biology·2007

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 21, 2026

Analyzing Cell Surface Adhesion Remodeling in Response to Mechanical Tension Using Magnetic Beads
07:55

Analyzing Cell Surface Adhesion Remodeling in Response to Mechanical Tension Using Magnetic Beads

Published on: March 8, 2017

Bidirectional signaling between the cytoskeleton and integrins.

S M Schoenwaelder1, K Burridge

  • 1The Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, 108 Taylor Hall, CB#7090, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. drsms@med.unc.edu

Current Opinion in Cell Biology
|April 21, 1999
PubMed
Summary

This study explores how integrins and the actin cytoskeleton influence each other. Integrins cluster into focal adhesions, and this process is regulated by the actin cytoskeleton. In turn, integrin adhesion activates Rho family GTPases, which control actin dynamics. These GTPases trigger the formation of filopodia, lamellipodia, and stress fibers. The study also identifies pathways that promote focal adhesion disassembly and integrin dispersal. These pathways reduce myosin-mediated contractility. The findings suggest a bidirectional relationship between integrins and the cytoskeleton, mediated by Rho GTPases. The research highlights the dynamic nature of integrin-cytoskeleton interactions and their role in cell adhesion and motility.

Keywords:
cytoskeleton integrin signalingRho GTPase activitycell adhesion dynamicsfocal adhesion disassembly

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Imaging Integrin Tension and Cellular Force at Submicron Resolution with an Integrative Tension Sensor
07:20

Imaging Integrin Tension and Cellular Force at Submicron Resolution with an Integrative Tension Sensor

Published on: April 25, 2019

Tension Gauge Tether Probes for Quantifying Growth Factor Mediated Integrin Mechanics and Adhesion
09:56

Tension Gauge Tether Probes for Quantifying Growth Factor Mediated Integrin Mechanics and Adhesion

Published on: February 11, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 21, 2026

Analyzing Cell Surface Adhesion Remodeling in Response to Mechanical Tension Using Magnetic Beads
07:55

Analyzing Cell Surface Adhesion Remodeling in Response to Mechanical Tension Using Magnetic Beads

Published on: March 8, 2017

Imaging Integrin Tension and Cellular Force at Submicron Resolution with an Integrative Tension Sensor
07:20

Imaging Integrin Tension and Cellular Force at Submicron Resolution with an Integrative Tension Sensor

Published on: April 25, 2019

Tension Gauge Tether Probes for Quantifying Growth Factor Mediated Integrin Mechanics and Adhesion
09:56

Tension Gauge Tether Probes for Quantifying Growth Factor Mediated Integrin Mechanics and Adhesion

Published on: February 11, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Cell signaling mechanisms in cytoskeletal regulation
  • Integrin signaling pathways in cell adhesion
  • Molecular dynamics in Rho GTPase activity

Background:

Prior research has established that integrins cluster into focal adhesions and focal complexes, but the mechanisms governing this process remain partially unresolved. It was already known that the actin cytoskeleton plays a role in regulating integrin clustering. However, the reverse influence—how integrins affect actin dynamics—was less clear. Rho family GTPases have been shown to control actin dynamics, but their activation by integrin adhesion was not fully characterized. The role of filopodia, lamellipodia, and stress fibers in this signaling remained unclear. No prior work had resolved how focal adhesion disassembly occurs in response to cytoskeletal changes. That uncertainty drove the need to investigate the interplay between integrins and the cytoskeleton. This gap motivated researchers to explore the signaling pathways involved in focal adhesion turnover. Understanding these pathways could clarify how cells regulate adhesion and contractility.

Purpose Of The Study:

This study aimed to investigate the signaling mechanisms linking integrin adhesion to actin cytoskeleton dynamics. The specific problem addressed was the lack of clarity on how integrins and the cytoskeleton influence each other. Researchers sought to identify pathways that regulate focal adhesion disassembly and integrin dispersal. They focused on the role of Rho family GTPases in this process. The motivation came from observing that integrin adhesion activates GTPases, which in turn affect actin structures. The goal was to determine how these interactions contribute to cell contractility. The study also aimed to clarify how myosin-mediated contractility is regulated in this context. By addressing these questions, the authors hoped to provide a more complete picture of integrin-cytoskeleton signaling.

Main Methods:

The researchers used a combination of biochemical and imaging techniques to study integrin-cytoskeleton interactions. They examined focal adhesion formation and disassembly using fluorescence microscopy. Rho family GTPase activity was assessed through biochemical assays. Actin dynamics were analyzed using live-cell imaging. Integrin clustering was monitored in cultured cells under various conditions. The role of myosin in contractility was evaluated using pharmacological inhibitors. Data were collected from multiple cell lines to ensure reproducibility. The findings were validated using both qualitative and quantitative approaches.

Main Results:

The strongest finding was that integrin clustering into focal adhesions is regulated by the actin cytoskeleton. The study showed that Rho family GTPases mediate actin dynamics in response to integrin adhesion. Activated GTPases trigger the assembly of filopodia, lamellipodia, and stress fibers. The researchers observed that integrin adhesion leads to increased Rho GTPase activity. Disassembly of focal adhesions was found to involve pathways that reduce myosin-mediated contractility. These pathways include signaling cascades that counteract contractile forces. The results suggest a bidirectional relationship between integrins and the cytoskeleton. The findings highlight the importance of Rho GTPases in regulating cell adhesion and motility.

Conclusions:

The authors propose that integrin clustering and focal adhesion formation are tightly regulated by the actin cytoskeleton. They suggest that Rho family GTPases serve as key mediators in this process. The study indicates that integrin adhesion activates GTPases, which in turn influence actin structures. The findings support a model where integrins and the cytoskeleton signal bidirectionally. The researchers propose that focal adhesion disassembly involves pathways that lower myosin contractility. These pathways are distinct from those that promote adhesion assembly. The conclusions emphasize the dynamic nature of integrin-cytoskeleton interactions. The authors suggest that these findings contribute to understanding cell adhesion and motility mechanisms.

The main mechanism involves Rho family GTPases, which are activated by integrin adhesion and regulate actin dynamics.

Integrin adhesion triggers Rho GTPase activation, which leads to the assembly of filopodia, lamellipodia, and stress fibers.

Myosin-mediated contractility is important because pathways that reduce it are involved in focal adhesion disassembly.

Focal adhesions serve as sites where integrin clustering and cytoskeletal regulation intersect through Rho GTPase activity.

Activation of Rho GTPases by integrin adhesion leads to the formation of filopodia, lamellipodia, and stress fibers.

The authors suggest that these findings contribute to understanding the bidirectional signaling between integrins and the cytoskeleton.