Related Experiment Videos

Stroke following internal carotid artery occlusion - a contra-indication for intravenous thrombolysis?

J Rudolf1, M Neveling, M Grond

  • 1Klinik fur Neurologie der Universitat zu Koln, Joseph-Stelzmann-Strasse 9, D-50924 Koln, Germany.

Insights

This study on intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) for carotid artery occlusion found no major complications. Results suggest rt-PA may benefit stroke patients with internal carotid artery dissection or atherothrombotic occlusion.

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Vascular Medicine
  • Interventional Radiology

Background:

  • Carotid artery occlusion is a significant cause of ischemic stroke.
  • Intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) is a standard treatment for acute ischemic stroke.
  • The efficacy and safety of rt-PA in patients with carotid artery occlusion, particularly those with dissection or atherothrombosis, require further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous rt-PA in patients with carotid artery occlusion.
  • To compare outcomes between patients with internal carotid artery dissection (ICD) and atherothrombotic internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion treated with rt-PA.
  • To determine if patients with acute ischemic stroke following ICA occlusion should be excluded from intravenous thrombolysis.

Main Methods:

  • A consecutive series of 15 patients with carotid artery occlusion diagnosed via duplex sonography were treated with intravenous rt-PA.
  • Treatment followed a protocol similar to the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) study.
  • Patients were categorized into internal carotid artery dissection (ICD) or atherothrombotic internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion groups based on ultrasound findings.

Main Results:

  • No significant hemorrhagic complications were observed following rt-PA treatment for ICA occlusion.
  • Three of 15 patients with ICA occlusion achieved excellent late functional outcomes; four had moderate to poor outcomes.
  • Four patients died, with mortality linked to stroke severity at admission.
  • A potentially better outcome was observed in the small group of patients with ICD compared to those with atherothrombotic ICA occlusion.

Conclusions:

  • Intravenous rt-PA treatment for carotid artery occlusion did not result in devastating complications in this case series.
  • The data do not support the a priori exclusion of patients with acute ischemic stroke following ICA occlusion from intravenous thrombolysis.
  • This pilot study suggests that the potential benefit of rt-PA in stroke following acute or chronic ICA occlusion warrants assessment in larger prospective trials.

Related Concept Videos