Parametric polar maps of regional myocardial beta-adrenoceptor density

Quantification of myocardial beta-adrenoceptor density (Bmax) is of interest in cardiac diseases in which altered function of the sympathetic nervous system is thought to play a pathophysiological role. PET provides an unrivaled means of taking regional measurements of cardiac microcirculatory function, tissue metabolism and autonomic nervous system activity. Measurements in small regional areas may be biased because of increased noise levels. This study examined the parametric polar map approach for the regional quantification of Bmax.

Dynamic PET with parametric polar map imaging was performed in 10 healthy volunteers and 4 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy using (S)-[11C]-(4-(3-tertiarybutylamino-2-hydroxypropoxy)-benzidimaz ole-2)-on hydrochloride (CGP)-12177 and a double-injection protocol. Time-activity curves were corrected for partial volume, spill-over and wall motion effects. The mean Bmax of the left ventricle was calculated in two ways. First, the average time-activity curve of all segments, having the highest achievable signal-to-noise ratio, was used to calculate Bmax(mTAC) (the myocardial beta-adrenoceptor density of the left ventricle calculated using the average time-activity curve). The bias in Bmax(mTAC) introduced by noise is minimal. Second, an estimate of whole-heart receptor density was calculated using the polar map method by averaging the values of Bmax obtained for 576 individual segments. In these calculations, three different filters (3 x 5, 3 x 9 and 3 x 13 segments) were used to smooth the time-activity curves before calculating Bmax. Mean values of whole-left-ventricular receptor density obtained by averaging regional values using the different filters (Bmax(PMF1/2/3)) were compared with Bmax(mTAC) to assess bias introduced by the polar map approach. Segments with a calculated Bmax outside the range 0.1-50 pmol/g were considered unreliable and were excluded from the analysis.

The differences between the two methods of calculating Bmax were small (7.8%, 4.8% and 3.2%, with the three filters, respectively). Reliable results were obtained in >95% of the segments and in 9 volunteers and all 4 patients.

When using PET for the quantification of beta-adrenoceptor density, the regional variation in Bmax can be reliably assessed using the parametric polar map approach.