Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Suspension systems for prostheses.

S Kapp1

  • 1Prosthetics-Orthotics Program, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas 75235-9091, USA.

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
|April 23, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Informal carers and wound management: an integrative literature review.

Journal of wound care·2015
Same author

UK national guideline on safer sex advice.

International journal of STD & AIDS·2012
Same author

Predicting concordance with multilayer compression bandaging.

Journal of wound care·2011
Same author

Significance of hyperlactatemia in acute hypnotic drug poisoning.

Klinische Wochenschrift·1981
Same author

[Clinical chemistry studies in comatose patients].

Klinische Anasthesiologie und Intensivtherapie·1979
Same author

[Special aspects of fracture healing in cranio-cerebral injuries].

Helvetica chirurgica acta·1978

Choosing the right lower extremity prosthesis suspension is key for safety and function. Factors like limb length, activity, and patient preference guide the selection of effective prosthetic suspension systems.

Area of Science:

  • Prosthetics and Orthotics
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Rehabilitation Medicine

Background:

  • Proper suspension is crucial for safe and effective lower extremity prostheses.
  • Numerous factors influence the choice of prosthetic suspension systems.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and categorize various lower extremity prosthetic suspension methods.
  • To highlight key factors influencing the selection of appropriate suspension systems for amputees.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of current prosthetic suspension technologies.
  • Analysis of patient-specific factors influencing suspension choice.
  • Categorization of suspension types based on amputation level and patient characteristics.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Transtibial amputation: supracondylar cuff, sleeves, gel liners (average/long); supracondylar/suprapatellar (short); waist belts (new/vascular compromise).
  • Transfemoral amputation: suction suspension is preferred for standard/long residual limbs.
  • Easier donning options include silicone liners and hyperbaric socks; total elastic suspension belt offers auxiliary support.

Conclusions:

  • Suspension system selection requires a comprehensive assessment of residual limb characteristics, patient activity, and preferences.
  • A tailored approach to prosthetic suspension ensures optimal function, safety, and patient satisfaction.