Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Assessment of risks associated with multiple events].

C Com-Nougué1, S Guérin, A Rey

  • 1Département de Biostatistique et d'Epidémiologie, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.

Revue D'Epidemiologie Et De Sante Publique
|April 24, 1999
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces competing risk analysis, a statistical method essential for understanding survival data when multiple dependent events occur. It clarifies when to use this advanced analysis over simpler methods for accurate event interpretation.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Membrane proteome analysis identifies key components of sensing in Phytophthora parasitica zoospores.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Corrigendum: Long term NIV in an infant with Hallermann-Streiff syndrome: a case report and overview of respiratory morbidity.

Frontiers in pediatrics·2024
Same author

Detection of cardiac arrhythmia patterns in ECG through H × C plane.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2023
Same author

Transient intraoperative opacification of a Carlevale intraocular lens.

Journal francais d'ophtalmologie·2022
Same author

Long term NIV in an infant with Hallermann-Streiff syndrome: A case report and overview of respiratory morbidity.

Frontiers in pediatrics·2022
Same author

Synthesising existing research on complicated grief in intellectual disability: findings from a systematic review.

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR·2022

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Evaluating patient outcomes often involves assessing overall survival and event-free survival (EFS).
  • Understanding the contribution of individual events to EFS is crucial but complicated by event dependencies.
  • Standard survival analyses may be inappropriate when dealing with multiple, interrelated events.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To define situations where competing risk analyses are necessary.
  • To differentiate competing risk analysis from simpler, potentially inappropriate alternatives.
  • To illustrate challenges in analyzing multiple dependent or exclusive events.

Main Methods:

  • Presentation of two illustrative examples highlighting analytical challenges.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Development of statistical methods for computing competing risks.
  • Explanation of how to interpret results from competing risk analyses.

    • Main Results:

    • Competing risk analysis provides a framework for dissecting EFS into components.
    • It accounts for event dependencies and exclusivity, offering more accurate insights.
    • The study details appropriate statistical tools and their interpretation.

    Conclusions:

    • Competing risk analysis is vital for accurately assessing survival outcomes with multiple events.
    • It offers a more appropriate approach than standard methods in complex scenarios.
    • Proper application and interpretation of competing risk methods enhance clinical research validity.