Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Standardized lifetime risk.

P D Sasieni1, J Adams

  • 1Department of Mathematics, Statistics, and Epidemiology, Imperial Cancer Research Fund, London, United Kingdom.

American Journal of Epidemiology
|April 30, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

In the melting pot.

Nursing times·2002
Same author

Nurses' use of professional distancing in the appropriation of CAM: a text analysis.

Complementary therapies in medicine·2002
Same author

Improving risk assessment: hip geometry, bone mineral distribution and bone strength in hip fracture cases and controls. The EPOS study. European Prospective Osteoporosis Study.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2002
Same author

Professional ethics. A case study of infusion nurse consultants.

Journal of intravenous nursing : the official publication of the Intravenous Nurses Society·2002
Same author

Clinical guidelines for the use of the prone position in acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Intensive & critical care nursing·2002
Same author

Direct integrative practice, time constraints and reactive strategy: an examination of GP therapists' perceptions of their complementary medicine.

Journal of management in medicine·2002
Same journal

Design and procedures for the greenness, cognitive performance and vascular outcomes in the northern Manhattan study (NOMAS-greenness).

American journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Correction to: Home dampness and molds and occurrence of respiratory tract infections in the first 27 years of life: the Espoo Cohort Study.

American journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

A SIMPLE AND POWERFUL TEST OF VACCINE WANING.

American journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Association Between maternal body mass index, offspring growth and pubertal timing: results from a longitudinal birth cohort study.

American journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Correction to: Developing a novel algorithm to identify incident and prevalent dementia in Medicare claims-the ARIC Study.

American journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

RE: advancing observational research on arts and health: theory-informed approaches using the RADIANCE framework.

American journal of epidemiology·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces two new, easy-to-understand risk measures: standardized lifetime risk and standardized years of life lost. These metrics simplify public health data communication and disease impact analysis.

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Standardized rates are crucial for comparing health data across populations.
  • Existing measures can be complex and require specialized training for interpretation.
  • Clearer risk communication is essential for public health policy and understanding.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce two novel, standardized risk measures: standardized lifetime risk and standardized number of years of life lost.
  • To provide standardizing weights based on 1992 data from England and Wales.
  • To illustrate the utility of these new measures with practical examples.

Main Methods:

  • Development of two new standardized risk measures.
  • Application of standardizing weights derived from 1992 England and Wales mortality data.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Illustrative examples demonstrating the application and interpretation of the new measures.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed measures offer advantages of standardized rates while being more intuitively understood.
    • Examples demonstrate their use in examining trends, comparing disease impact, and international comparisons.
    • A shift towards more accessible risk communication is advocated, e.g., 41/1,000 women dying of breast cancer versus a complex rate.

    Conclusions:

    • The new standardized lifetime risk and years of life lost measures enhance risk communication.
    • These measures facilitate clearer analysis of disease trends, public health impact, and international comparisons.
    • Adoption of these measures can improve public understanding of health risks and disease burden.