Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Mouse laparoscopy.

E Hirsch1, T Otto, R Blanchard

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, 630 West 168th Street, 16th Floor, New York, NY 10032, USA.

The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists
|May 5, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pathways to epilepsy surgery in children with tuberous sclerosis complex-associated epilepsy.

Revue neurologique·2024
Same author

Drug-resistant generalized epilepsies: Revisiting the frontiers of idiopathic generalized epilepsies.

Revue neurologique·2024
Same author

Vagus nerve stimulation in epilepsy: Efficiency and safety of outpatient practice.

Neuro-Chirurgie·2020
Same author

Predictive factors of epilepsy in arteriovenous malformation.

Neuro-Chirurgie·2020
Same author

Optimising the biocompatibility of 3D printed photopolymer constructs in vitro and in vivo.

Biomedical materials (Bristol, England)·2019
Same author

Application of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose as a protective agent against magnesium stearate induced crystallization of amorphous itraconazole.

European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences·2018
Same journal

Does a minimally invasive surgery fellowship impact surgical experience among gynecology residents?

The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists·2005
Same journal

Body piercing affecting laparoscopy: perioperative precautions.

The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists·2005
Same journal

Ureteral endometriosis: the role of magnetic resonance imaging.

The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists·2005
Same journal

Trocar-assisted sling suspension for stress urinary incontinence: three-year follow-up.

The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists·2005
Same journal

New helical incision for removal of large uteri during laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy.

The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists·2005
Same journal

Preliminary experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy.

The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists·2005
See all related articles

This study describes a new method for performing minimally invasive abdominal surgery in pregnant mice. Researchers found that this procedure allows for safe observation of developing embryos without affecting the number of pups born or causing long-term health issues for the mothers.

Area of Science:

  • Reproductive biology research within mouse laparoscopy techniques
  • Veterinary surgery and experimental animal models

Background:

Current surgical methods for observing internal organs in small animal models often require invasive procedures that may compromise physiological states. Researchers lack a reliable, minimally invasive approach for longitudinal monitoring of early pregnancy in mice. Traditional open surgeries frequently induce significant trauma and systemic stress responses that can confound experimental data. This gap motivated the development of a refined endoscopic procedure tailored for murine subjects. Prior research has shown that standard surgical interventions can alter immune responses, potentially skewing results in developmental studies. No prior work had resolved the need for a technique that balances visualization with minimal tissue disruption. That uncertainty drove the exploration of endoscopic tools adapted for the unique anatomical constraints of the mouse. This study addresses these challenges by establishing a standardized protocol for abdominal visualization in pregnant murine models.

Purpose Of The Study:

Keywords:
endoscopic surgeryreproductive biologyanimal research methodsgestational development

Frequently Asked Questions

The researchers propose that the procedure allows for the accurate counting of gestations as early as one day after implantation. This is achieved by manipulating intraabdominal contents to visualize both uterine horns, which is not possible with non-invasive imaging.

The study utilized CD-1 pregnant mice to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the endoscopic approach. These animals were chosen to represent a standard model for assessing reproductive outcomes following surgical intervention.

The authors state that an initial learning period is required to perform the surgery safely. This is necessary to minimize risks such as hemorrhage, which occurred in three mice during the early stages of the study.

The researchers employed anesthesia alone for the control group, while the experimental group received anesthesia plus the endoscopic intervention. This comparison allowed the team to isolate the effects of the surgery from the impact of the sedative agents.

Related Experiment Videos

The primary aim of this study was to develop a standardized technique for performing laparoscopy in the mouse. Researchers sought to create a method that allows for internal visualization without the trauma of open surgery. This investigation addresses the need for refined surgical approaches in small animal reproductive studies. The authors intended to evaluate the safety and feasibility of this procedure during early pregnancy. They aimed to determine if the intervention affects the number of pups delivered at term. The team also sought to compare pregnancy failure rates between operated and control groups. Furthermore, they investigated whether the procedure leads to the formation of intraabdominal adhesions. This work was motivated by the desire to perform intraabdominal manipulations while preserving normal immune function in the animal model.

Main Methods:

The study design involved a controlled animal investigation conducted within a university research laboratory setting. Researchers enrolled twenty-eight pregnant CD-1 subjects to evaluate the safety of the proposed endoscopic intervention. Eight animals served as a control group receiving only anesthesia, while twenty underwent the surgical procedure. The team performed the intervention at two specific time points during the gestation period. Review approach involved comparing pregnancy outcomes between the surgical and control cohorts to identify potential adverse effects. Investigators monitored the subjects for mortality and complications, including hemorrhage or anesthetic overdose. They assessed the success of the procedure by evaluating the delivery of pups at term. Finally, the team conducted autopsies after delivery to check for the presence of intraabdominal adhesions.

Main Results:

The strongest finding indicates that the surgical procedure does not significantly alter the number of pups delivered at term. Operated subjects produced an average of 8.7 plus or minus 5.1 pups, while control animals delivered 8.9 plus or minus 3.8. Pregnancy failure rates were recorded at 18.8 percent for the experimental group and 12.5 percent for controls. Post-delivery autopsies revealed that intraabdominal adhesions occurred in 12.5 percent of both the surgical and control groups. Early in the series, four animals died, with three cases attributed to hemorrhage and one to anesthetic overdose. The researchers successfully manipulated intraabdominal contents to visualize both uterine horns in their entirety. They accurately counted gestations as early as one day after implantation. The findings demonstrate that the technique can be performed safely and repeatedly following an initial learning phase.

Conclusions:

The authors propose that this endoscopic approach offers a viable alternative to traditional open surgery for murine research. Their findings suggest that the procedure does not negatively impact the number of pups delivered at term. The researchers note that pregnancy failure rates remain comparable between the surgical and control groups. They conclude that the technique allows for accurate counting of gestations shortly after implantation occurs. The team highlights that the method avoids the immunosuppressive effects typically associated with more invasive abdominal entries. This synthesis implies that the procedure is suitable for studies requiring preserved immune function during pregnancy. The authors maintain that the approach can be performed safely after researchers complete an initial training phase. They suggest that the ability to manipulate internal contents facilitates comprehensive observation of both uterine horns.

The study measured the number of pups delivered at term, the frequency of pregnancy failure, and the presence of intraabdominal adhesions. These metrics were compared between the surgical and control groups to assess long-term safety.

The researchers suggest that this method is useful for investigations requiring intraabdominal manipulations when maintaining immune function is necessary. This is because the technique avoids the immunosuppression typically associated with traditional open laparotomy.