G-CSF during Escherichia coli versus Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia in rats has fundamentally different and opposite...

We investigated if bacteria type alters outcome with prophylactic granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) therapy during pneumonia. Rats received G-CSF or placebo daily for 6 d and after the third dose were intrabronchially inoculated with either Escherichia coli or Staphylococcus aureus. Without G-CSF, E. coli and S. aureus produced similar (p = NS) mortality rates (36 versus 38%) and serial changes in mean circulating neutrophil counts (CNC), but differing mean (+/- SE) tumor necrosis factor (TNF) levels (E. coli, 259 +/- 104 versus S. aureus, 51 +/- 17 pg/ml, p = 0.01). G-CSF prior to bacteria increased mean CNC more than six times compared with placebo (p = 0.001). However, with G-CSF in the first 6 h after E. coli, there was a greater than 20-fold decrease in mean (+/- SE) CNC (x 10(3)/ mm3) to below placebo (0.5 +/- 0.1 versus 0.8 +/- 0.1), whereas with G-CSF after S. aureus, there was only a fivefold decrease in mean CNC and CNC were greater than placebo (1.8 +/- 0.2 versus 0.8 +/- 0.1) (E. coli versus S. aureus decrease in CNC with G-CSF, p = 0.001). With E. coli, G-CSF worsened oxygenation and increased bacteremia and mortality, whereas with S. aureus, G-CSF improved oxygenation and decreased bacteremia and mortality (G-CSF therapy, E. coli versus S. aureus, p = 0.03, 0.05, and 0.001, respectively). Thus, during S. aureus pneumonia with low TNF levels, G-CSF increased CNC and bacterial clearance, resulting in less pulmonary injury and decreased death. During E. coli pneumonia with high TNF levels, G-CSF paradoxically decreased CNC, resulting in impaired bacterial clearance and worsened pulmonary injury and death. Bacterial species and the associated inflammatory mediator response can alter outcome with prophylactic G-CSF therapy during pneumonia.