Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Computerized bone densitometric analysis: operator-dependent errors.

R B Staron1, R Greenspan, T T Miller

  • 1Department of Radiology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.

Radiology
|May 6, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Revisiting the endocrine and metabolic manifestations of COVID-19 two years into the pandemic.

Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders·2022
Same author

In premenopausal women with idiopathic osteoporosis, lower bone formation rate is associated with higher body fat and higher IGF-1.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2021
Same author

A Simple Formula to Estimate Parathyroid Weight on 4D-CT, Predict Pathologic Weight, and Diagnose Parathyroid Adenoma in Patients with Primary Hyperparathyroidism.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2020
Same author

Consensus statement from 2<sup>nd</sup> International Conference on Controversies in Vitamin D.

Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders·2020
Same author

Hypercalciuria: its value as a predictive risk factor for nephrolithiasis in asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism?

Journal of endocrinological investigation·2019
Same author

Long-term denosumab treatment restores cortical bone loss and reduces fracture risk at the forearm and humerus: analyses from the FREEDOM Extension cross-over group.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2019
Same journal

Erratum for: Prediction of Lobar Emphysema Progression with a CT-Based Foundational Model.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Erratum for: Associations of MRI-derived Paraspinal IMAT and LMM with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: Results from a German Cohort.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Erratum for: Blue Rubber Bleb Nevus Syndrome.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Redefining the Clinical Role of MRI in Endometrial Cancer Staging.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

To Ablate or Not to Ablate: The Colorectal Liver Metastasis Question.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

The Limits of Radiologic Categorization in Pulmonary Nonsolid Nodules.

Radiology·2026
See all related articles

Operator-dependent errors in dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) are rare, with most occurring in spinal analysis due to marker misplacement. Physician review is crucial for detecting and correcting these rare misdiagnoses.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Bone Densitometry

Background:

  • Dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is a key tool for assessing bone mineral density.
  • Operator-dependent errors can potentially impact DXA analysis accuracy.
  • Understanding these errors is vital for maintaining diagnostic integrity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify the types and frequency of operator-dependent errors in DXA analysis.
  • To assess the impact of these errors on diagnostic accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective review of 2,528 DXA scans (forearm, femoral neck, lumbar spine) over 40 months.
  • Analyses performed by 11 technologists using standard software.
  • Radiologist review to record and correct all analysis errors.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • No errors were found in forearm analyses.
  • Femoral neck analysis errors occurred in 0.9% of cases, primarily due to region misplacement.
  • Spinal analysis errors occurred in 1.3% of cases, mainly from misplacing intervertebral disk markers.
  • Overall, 0.2% of femur and spine analyses resulted in misdiagnosis.

Conclusions:

  • Operator-dependent analysis errors in DXA are infrequent and rarely lead to misdiagnosis.
  • Accurate spinal analysis relies on precise identification of vertebral anatomy.
  • Supervising physician review, knowledgeable in anatomy and potential artifacts, is essential for error detection and correction.