Calcium chloride minimizes the hemodynamic effects of propofol in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 23, 2026

Surgical Porcine Model of Chronic Myocardial Ischemia Treated by Exosome-laden Collagen Patch and Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft
Published on: September 15, 2023
L Tritapepe1, P Voci, P Marino
1Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Rome La Sapienza, Azienda Ospedaliera S Giovanni e Addolorata, Italy.
Insights
Calcium chloride (CaCl2) administration during anesthesia induction mitigates propofol's negative cardiac effects in coronary artery bypass grafting patients. This intervention preserves hemodynamic stability, crucial for cardiac surgery outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Anesthesiology
- Pharmacology
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Propofol is a common anesthetic agent.
- Anesthetic induction can negatively impact cardiac function, especially in patients with compromised cardiovascular systems.
- Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients are particularly vulnerable to hemodynamic changes during surgery.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the hemodynamic effects of propofol during anesthesia induction.
- To determine if calcium chloride (CaCl2) can counteract propofol-induced negative cardiac effects.
- To assess the safety and efficacy of this intervention in CABG patients.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, randomized study was conducted with 58 patients undergoing elective CABG.
- Patients received fentanyl, pancuronium, and propofol for anesthesia induction.
- Group A received saline, while Group B received calcium chloride (CaCl2) concurrently with propofol.
Main Results:
- Propofol significantly decreased heart rate, mean arterial pressure, stroke volume index, cardiac index, and cardiac output in the control group (Group A).
- In contrast, patients receiving CaCl2 (Group B) exhibited negligible changes in these hemodynamic parameters.
- Mean arterial pressure decreased significantly in both groups, but less so in the CaCl2 group.
Conclusions:
- Simultaneous administration of calcium chloride (CaCl2) during propofol induction minimizes adverse effects on cardiac function.
- This strategy is beneficial for maintaining hemodynamic stability in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
- CaCl2 can be a valuable adjunct to propofol anesthesia in CABG patients.
Objective:
To assess the hemodynamic effects of propofol and the counteracting effect of calcium chloride (CaCl2) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
Design:
Prospective, randomized study.
Setting:
University hospital, department of cardiac surgery.
Participants:
Fifty-eight patients undergoing elective CABG, divided into group A (n = 29) and group B (n = 29).
Interventions:
Anesthesia was induced with a combination of fentanyl, 7 microg/kg; pancuronium, 0.1 mg/kg; and propofol, 1.5 mg/kg, administered over 60 seconds. A blinded investigator administered saline in group A patients and 10 mg/kg of CaCl2 in group B patients at the same speed and same time as propofol administration through another lumen of the central venous catheter.
Measurements And Main Results:
Hemodynamic data were obtained at baseline (T0), 2 minutes after anesthesia induction (T1), and 2 minutes after tracheal intubation (T2). Heart rate decreased significantly in group A patients (86.2+/-11.3 beats/min at T0 and 72.8+/-7.5 beats/min at T2; p < 0.001). Mean arterial pressure decreased significantly in patients in both groups (group A, 108.0+/-12.0 mmHg at T0; 74.6+/-14.6mmHg at T2;p < 0.001 and group B, 106.0+/-10.2 mmHg at T0; 90.4+/-10.0 mmHg at T2; p < 0.05). Stroke volume index, cardiac index, and cardiac output decreased in group A patients (39.4+/-4.1 mL/beat/m2 at T0 and 28.8+/-5.2 mL/beat/m2 at T2; p < 0.05; 3.4+/-0.6 L/min/m2 at T0 and 1.9+/-0.3 L/min/m2 at T2; p < 0.001; 5.9+/-0.9 L/min at T0 and 3.4+/-0.4 L/min at T2; p < 0.001, respectively), whereas in group B patients, changes were negligible (38.1+/-7.0 mL/beat/m2 at T0 v 35.7+/-6.6 mL/beat/m2 at T2; (NS) 3.3+/-0.5 L/min/m2 at T0 v 2.7+/-0.3 L/min/m2 at T2; (NS) 5.7+/-0.9 L/min at T0 v 4.7+/-0.5 L/min at T2; (NS), respectively).
Conclusion:
Simultaneous administration of CaCl2 during the induction of anesthesia minimizes the potential negative effect of propofol on cardiac function in cardiac patients.
Related Concept Videos
Depolarizing Blockers: Pharmocokinetics
Antianginal Drugs: Calcium Channel Blockers and Ranolazine
CCBs, a diverse class that includes dihydropyridines (nifedipine) and diphenylalkylamines (verapamil and diltiazem), exert their effect by blocking calcium channels in cardiac and smooth muscle cells. This...
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class IV Agents as Calcium Channel Blockers
Verapamil, a calcium channel blocker, inhibits calcium movement across myocardial cell membranes and vascular smooth muscle. This results in the dilation of coronary and...
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class I Agents as Sodium Channel Blockers
Class 1A Antiarrhythmic Drugs: These drugs work by moderately blocking sodium channels,...
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
Antihypertensive Drugs: Action of Calcium Channel Blockers
