[Coronary surgery without extracorporeal circulation: the short-term results in high-risk patients]
G Pompilio1, C Antona, A Cannata
1Cattedra di Cardiochirurgia, Università degli Studi di Milano.
Insights
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is a promising technique for high-risk patients, showing reduced complications and shorter hospital stays. This off-pump CABG offers better neurologic and cardiac protection, decreasing the need for blood transfusions.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Thoracic Surgery
Background:
- Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is a common surgical procedure.
- High-risk patients often face increased complications with traditional CABG using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the impact and safety of performing CABG without CPB (off-pump) in high-risk patients.
- To compare postoperative outcomes, complications, and resource utilization between off-pump and on-pump CABG.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study of 71 high-risk patients undergoing off-pump CABG.
- A matched comparison group of 71 patients who underwent on-pump CABG, matched for 11 preoperative risk factors.
- Comparison of neurologic complications, myocardial cell injury, left ventricular performance, blood transfusion requirements, and length of hospital stay.
Main Results:
- Off-pump CABG showed significantly lower incidence of neurologic complications (0% vs. 9.8%) and reduced blood transfusion needs (11.2% vs. 26.7%).
- Patients undergoing off-pump CABG experienced less postoperative atrial fibrillation (14.1% vs. 30.9%) and earlier hospital discharge (9.3 days vs. 12.6 days).
- No significant difference in perioperative myocardial infarction or heart failure was observed, though off-pump showed better cardiac protection markers.
Conclusions:
- Off-pump CABG is a safe and effective alternative for high-risk patients.
- This technique provides superior neurologic and cardiac protection compared to on-pump CABG.
- Off-pump CABG reduces the need for blood transfusions and shortens postoperative hospital stay.
Background:
This study was conducted to assess the impact of coronary bypass surgery (CABG) without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) on high-risk patients.
Methods:
From February 1997 to July 1998, 71 patients considered at high-risk underwent a CABG off-pump. Using the "Higgins score", eleven preoperative risk factors were identified and stratified in this group of patients. Among 1271 patients who underwent CABG with CPB in the same period, using a computer-based matched comparison, a second identical group of patients was selected according to the 11 risk variables and the number with coronary disease, so that complete preoperative matching included the year of operation, score index and coronary target. Moreover, among seven other preoperative variables that were not included in the matching comparison, the two groups differed only in mean age (64 +/- 10.9 vs 61.6 +/- 7.3 in groups off and on-pump, respectively, p < 0.05). Postoperative outcome and complications and blood requirement were compared. Myocardial cell injury and left ventricular performance were also assessed in the two groups.
Results:
The global incidence of neurologic complications in the off-pump group was significantly lower (9.8 vs 0%, in on and off-pump groups, respectively; p = 0.02). Patients undergoing CABG off-pump required blood far less often (% of transfused patients: 26.7% for the patients with CPB and 11.2% for the patients without CPB; p = 0.032). Three patients from the on-pump group (4.2%) had a perioperative myocardial infarction (AMI), versus 0% of the off-pump cases (p = ns). Postoperative atrial fibrillation accounted for 14.1% in off-pump patients and 30.9% in on-pump patients (p = 0.027). One patient in both groups (1.4%) suffered from postoperative heart failure. Mean ventilation time and ICU stay did not differ significantly between the two groups. However, hospital discharge occurred earlier in the off-pump group (9.3 +/- 3 vs 12.6 +/- 8, p = 0.007). In-hospital death occurred in one case from the on-pump group (1.4%) versus 0% of patients operated off-pump. CPK-MB release in patients without perioperative AMI was significantly lower in off-pump patients 6 and 12 hours after the operation (36.6 +/- 17 IU/l vs 69.8 +/- 23 IU/l after 6 hours, p < 0.05; and 36.7 +/- 19 IU/l vs 67.3 +/- 26 IU/l after 12 hours, p < 0.05, in off and on-pump groups, respectively) and LVSWI turned out to be better in off-pump patients 6 hours postoperatively (34.2 +/- 2 g*m/m2 vs 27.2 +/- 3 g*m/m2, p < 0.01).
Conclusions:
CABG without CPB seems to be a promising technique for high-risk patients. It offers better neurologic and cardiac protection, shortens postoperative hospital stay and reduces the need for blood transfusion.
More Related Videos
09:12Surgical Swine Model of Chronic Cardiac Ischemia Treated by Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Published on: March 27, 2018
05:25Surgical Porcine Model of Chronic Myocardial Ischemia Treated by Exosome-laden Collagen Patch and Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft
Published on: September 15, 2023
