Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Methods for beam data acquisition offered by a mini-phantom.

D Georg1, A Dutreix

  • 1Department of Oncology, UZ Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.

Physics in Medicine and Biology
|May 8, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Erratum: Time-resolved dosimetry for validation of 4D dose calculation in PBS proton therapy (2020<i>Phys. Med. Biol.</i>65 125015).

Physics in medicine and biology·2025
Same author

Automation of ePROMs in radiation oncology and its impact on patient response and bias.

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology·2024
Same author

Requirements for dose calculation on an active scanned proton beamline for small, shallow fields.

Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)·2023
Same author

Investigation of the Bragg peak degradation caused by homogeneous and heterogeneous lung tissue substitutes: proton beam experiments and comparison to current clinical dose calculation.

Physics in medicine and biology·2020
Same author

The practical radius of a pencil beam in proton therapy.

Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik·2020
Same author

Time-resolved dosimetry for validation of 4D dose calculation in PBS proton therapy.

Physics in medicine and biology·2020
Same journal

Effective contrast-enhanced preprocessing for intracranial artery segmentation in digital subtraction angiography.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Improving Plan Quality in Adaptive Proton Therapy Using an Interactive Dose Modification Tool.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Technical Note: Real-Time MLC Control and Latency Measurement Optimization with External Verification.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Fetus-Specific Hematopoietic Stem Cell Dosimetry Framework for Leukemia-Relevant Target Cells During Prenatal Development.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Deep learning-based dose prediction to enhance planning efficiency in cervical brachytherapy with hybrid applicators.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum: Referenceless MR thermometry-a comparison of five methods (2017<i>Phys. Med. Biol</i>.<b>62</b>1-16).

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
See all related articles

Mini-phantoms reliably measure key parameters in high-energy photon beams, simplifying beam quality assessment and verification. This cost-effective tool offers versatile measurement capabilities for essential beam data.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Radiotherapy Physics

Background:

  • Mini-phantoms are crucial for measuring head scatter parameters in high-energy photon beams.
  • Their utility has expanded to beam quality specification, necessitating validation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the feasibility and reliability of acquiring basic beam parameters using only a mini-phantom.
  • To evaluate mini-phantom performance across 6, 18, and 25 MV photon beams.

Main Methods:

  • Investigated head scatter correction factors, phantom scatter correction factors, total scatter correction factors, wedge factors, off-axis ratios, beam attenuation, and hardening coefficients.
  • Compared two beam quality specification methods: a constant source-to-chamber distance (1 m) and narrow beam geometry.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Calculated phantom scatter correction factors from measured head scatter and total scatter correction factors and attenuation coefficients.

    • Main Results:

    • Mu values showed systematic deviations between the two beam quality specification methods.
    • Relative variations in attenuation coefficients and beam quality modifications showed good agreement across methods for open and wedged beams.
    • Measured and calculated phantom scatter correction factors agreed within 1% with literature values.
    • Wedge factors measured in water and mini-phantoms agreed within 0.5% for 18 and 25 MV, with a maximum deviation of 1.5% at 6 MV.

    Conclusions:

    • Mini-phantoms are reliable, cost-effective tools for measuring basic beam parameters in high-energy photon beams.
    • Full scatter phantom availability is not essential for determining several beam data under full scatter conditions.
    • Mini-phantoms offer versatile capabilities for checking and verifying beam parameters in radiotherapy settings.