Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Prognostic factor research in oncology.

P Hermanek1

  • 1Chirurgische Universitätsklinik, Erlangen, Germany.

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
|May 11, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Accurate cancer prognosis relies on anatomic extent and staging systems like TNM/pTNM and residual tumor (R) classification. Identifying additional independent prognostic factors is crucial for improving patient outcome predictions.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Quality of care of acute ischemic stroke in Germany 2018].

Der Nervenarzt·2020
Same author

Oncological outcome after MRI-based selection for neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in the OCUM Rectal Cancer Trial.

The British journal of surgery·2018
Same author

[Performance Indicators of Hospitals in One Region Between 2006/07 and 2013: a Trend Analysis].

Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))·2015
Same author

Use of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Select Patients with Rectal Cancer for Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation--Interim Analysis of the German OCUM Trial (NCT01325649).

Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract·2015
Same author

[Spincter preservation after selective chemoradiotherapy of rectal cancer. Interim results of the OCUM study].

Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen·2015
Same author

[Lymph node dissection after primary surgery and neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy of rectal cancer. Interim analysis of a multicenter prospective observational study (OCUM)].

Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen·2015
Same journal

Using an Open Science Checklist in Grant Proposal Reviews to Predict Reproducibility of Funded Publications.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

A comparison of five statistical methods used to analyse longitudinal EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life scores in randomised controlled trials: a simulation study.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Sample Size Determination for Decision-centered Pragmatic Trials.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Many multicenter randomized controlled trials do not account for center effect: a methodological review.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Patient Acceptability of the Modified Zelen Approach to Randomized Trials - A Survey of the CAPS THA Cohort.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to SPICE-GRADE: simultaneous processing of indirect causal evidence in complex pathways using GRADE - an exploratory case study. [Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 194C (2026) 112219].

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Medical Statistics
  • Cancer Research

Background:

  • Solid tumor prognosis is primarily determined by anatomic extent and staging systems.
  • The TNM/pTNM and residual tumor (R) classification are internationally recognized prognostic indicators.
  • Existing staging systems may not capture all relevant prognostic information.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify independent prognostic factors beyond current staging systems for solid tumors.
  • To emphasize the importance of rigorous statistical methods in prognostic factor research.
  • To advocate for the development of integrated prognostic systems.

Main Methods:

  • Review of prognostic factor research methodologies.
  • Emphasis on the application of multivariate statistical methods.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Highlighting the need for collaboration between oncologists and statisticians.
  • Main Results:

    • Several independent prognostic factors exist in addition to TNM and R classification.
    • Careful evaluation of new prognostic factors is necessary before clinical adoption.
    • Multivariate methods are essential for identifying and validating prognostic factors.

    Conclusions:

    • Prognostic factor research requires robust statistical approaches and interdisciplinary collaboration.
    • Future advancements in cancer prognosis depend on developing comprehensive prognostic systems.
    • Integrating multiple independent factors with TNM/R staging will enhance prognostic accuracy.