Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Appropriateness review: which road to take?

W McCue, C F Pierce, A T Mott

    American Journal of Health Planning
    |September 9, 1978
    PubMed
    Summary

    Health planners offer differing views on health planning due to unique experiences. Analyzing these distinct perspectives is crucial for understanding complex healthcare issues.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Clarifying a complex case.

    Hospitals·1993
    Same author

    Zinc deficiency in a breast-fed infant.

    Texas medicine·1987
    Same author

    Unresolved issues and conflicts: the relationship between the state Health Planning Agency and the Health Services Agency.

    Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine·1982
    Same author

    HSA, hospital planning: arena of conflict offers room for cooperation.

    Hospitals·1980
    Same author

    Health promotion: how involved should HSAs be?

    Health care management review·1980
    Same author

    Hospitals' future depends upon long-range planning.

    Hospitals·1979

    Area of Science:

    • Health Services Research
    • Healthcare Management
    • Public Health Policy

    Background:

    • Healthcare planning involves multiple stakeholders with diverse expertise.
    • Differing interpretations can arise from varied professional backgrounds and experiences.
    • Understanding these diverse viewpoints is essential for effective health system development.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To highlight the divergent perspectives of health planners on a specific issue.
    • To analyze how individual experiences shape interpretations in health planning.
    • To underscore the importance of considering varied viewpoints in healthcare policy.

    Main Methods:

    • Qualitative analysis of expert opinions.
    • Comparative review of health planning interpretations.
    • Case study approach focusing on differing viewpoints.

    Main Results:

    • Significant divergence in interpretation of the central health planning issue was observed.
    • Messrs. McCue and Pierce presented a unified, yet distinct, perspective.
    • Mr. Mott offered a substantially different interpretation, emphasizing unique insights.

    Conclusions:

    • The study underscores that health planning is subjective and influenced by individual backgrounds.
    • Recognizing and integrating diverse perspectives is vital for comprehensive healthcare planning.
    • Further research should explore methods for reconciling differing expert opinions in health policy.

    Related Experiment Videos