Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Summary suspension: malice negates immunity.

R W Kaufman

    The Hospital Medical Staff
    |December 13, 1978
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Hospitals can use summary suspension to protect patients, as recent court rulings support this practice. Physicians involved in these reviews are protected by legal immunity statutes.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Legal review of contracts can save hospitals time and money.

    Hospitals·1980
    Same author

    Attorneys' requests for patient records.

    Arizona medicine·1980
    Same author

    Outmaneuvering the 'sweethearts' in malpractice suits.

    The Hospital medical staff·1977
    See all related articles
    JoVE
    x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
    ABOUT JoVE
    OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
    AUTHORS
    Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
    LIBRARIANS
    TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
    RESEARCH
    JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
    EDUCATION
    JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
    Terms & Conditions of Use
    Privacy Policy
    Policies

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Law
    • Healthcare Administration
    • Legal Medicine

    Background:

    • Hospitals and peer review committees face legal challenges regarding summary suspension.
    • Summary suspension is a critical tool for immediate patient safety interventions.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To review recent court cases concerning the use of summary suspension by hospitals.
    • To analyze judicial interpretations of summary suspension in healthcare settings.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of legal precedents and court decisions.
    • Analysis of case law related to hospital peer review and physician conduct.

    Main Results:

    • Courts affirm the appropriateness of summary suspension when patient protection is the objective.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Physicians participating in peer review are generally shielded by state immunity and common law qualified privilege.

    • Conclusions:

    • Summary suspension is a legally defensible measure for safeguarding patients.
    • Legal protections exist for physicians engaged in peer review processes, ensuring their participation without undue fear of litigation.