Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

No compromise reached on CON extension.

W T Berriman

    The Hospital Medical Staff
    |February 11, 1979
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Federal certificate of need laws for medical equipment are debated. Congress considered extending these laws to physicians' offices, with differing views from the AHA and AMA, leaving the issue unresolved.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Hospitals' viewpoint: staff privileges--the substantive issues.

    American medical news·1982
    Same author

    Antitrust and health planning.

    Medicolegal news·1981
    Same author

    Health planning: appropriateness review.

    Medicolegal news·1980
    Same author

    Health planning and the law: an update on the statute.

    Medicolegal news·1980
    Same author

    Regs control the planning process as well as the plan.

    Hospitals·1980
    Same author

    The politics of health planning: new role for hospital trustees.

    Trustee : the journal for hospital governing boards·1978
    JoVE
    x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
    ABOUT JoVE
    OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
    AUTHORS
    Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
    LIBRARIANS
    TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
    RESEARCH
    JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
    EDUCATION
    JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
    Terms & Conditions of Use
    Privacy Policy
    Policies

    Area of Science:

    • Health Policy
    • Medical Economics
    • Healthcare Regulation

    Background:

    • The federal Certificate of Need (CON) law, requiring states to regulate expensive medical equipment, was up for renewal.
    • Debate arose on whether to extend CON laws to cover equipment used outside of institutional settings, such as physicians' offices.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze the 95th Congress's debate regarding the scope of Certificate of Need laws.
    • To understand the differing perspectives of key stakeholders, including the American Hospital Association (AHA) and the American Medical Association (AMA).

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of legislative debates and policy discussions during the 95th Congress.
    • Examination of arguments presented by the AHA and AMA concerning the application of CON laws to noninstitutional settings.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • The American Hospital Association (AHA) advocated for closing a perceived loophole by including physicians' offices under CON regulations.
    • The American Medical Association (AMA) supported state autonomy, arguing that each state should decide on its own CON laws.
    • Congress was unable to reach a consensus on extending the CON law to noninstitutional settings.

    Conclusions:

    • The controversy surrounding the inclusion of physicians' offices in Certificate of Need laws remained unresolved after the 95th Congress.
    • This issue was anticipated to be a significant topic for discussion in the 96th Congress, highlighting ongoing policy challenges in healthcare regulation.