Related Experiment Videos
Physician response rates to mail and personal interview surveys
Public Opinion Quarterly
|February 6, 1980
Summary
This study found that mail surveys are more efficient than in-person surveys for collecting data on physician antibiotic prescription practices. Mail surveys require less time, cost, and yield higher response rates.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Survey Methodology
Background:
- Physician antibiotic prescription practices are crucial for public health.
- Standardized survey outcome definitions are lacking, hindering comparative analysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare mail and personal administration of a physician antibiotic prescription practices questionnaire.
- To introduce a framework for defining and comparing survey outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A randomized experiment was conducted comparing mail and personal survey administration.
- Six novel concepts were introduced to define and compare survey outcomes.
Main Results:
- Mail surveys were found to be more time-efficient, cost-effective, and achieved higher response rates than personal surveys.
- The study provides methods to optimize the mail survey technique.
Conclusions:
- Mail surveys offer a superior method for gathering data on physician antibiotic prescribing behaviors.
- The proposed outcome concepts aid in the consistent evaluation of survey methodologies.