Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Alternatives to defensive medicine.

R L Dickman

    The Hospital Medical Staff
    |August 10, 1979
    PubMed
    Summary

    Defensive medicine, driven by malpractice fears, harms patients and society. This practice, distinct from necessary care, offers physicians questionable legal benefits. Alternatives exist to reduce malpractice risks.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Bending the rules to get a medication.

    American family physician·2000
    Same author

    Does managed care require a new way of talking to patients? No.

    Managed care (Langhorne, Pa.)·1995
    Same author

    Shock chemistry in the molecular clouds associated with SNR IC 443.

    The Astrophysical journal·1989
    Same author

    The frequency of sexual problems among family practice patients.

    Family practice research journal·1988
    Same author

    An end to patchwork reform of health care.

    The New England journal of medicine·1987
    Same author

    Search for molecular oxygen in dense interstellar clouds.

    The Astrophysical journal·1985

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Ethics
    • Legal Medicine
    • Healthcare Policy

    Background:

    • Defensive medicine, characterized by excessive medical interventions primarily due to fear of litigation, is a significant concern in healthcare.
    • The practice raises ethical questions regarding patient welfare and resource allocation.
    • Its impact extends beyond individual physician-patient relationships to affect society broadly.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To critically evaluate the ethical implications of defensive medicine.
    • To assess the actual legal utility of defensive medicine for physicians in malpractice cases.
    • To explore and recommend alternatives for mitigating malpractice issues.

    Main Methods:

    • The study involves a critical analysis of existing literature on defensive medicine and malpractice.
    • It examines ethical frameworks relevant to medical decision-making under legal pressure.
    • The research synthesizes legal precedents and expert opinions.

    Main Results:

    • Defensive medicine is ethically questionable and provides limited, if any, genuine legal protection for physicians.
    • The practice leads to increased healthcare costs, unnecessary procedures for patients, and societal burdens.
    • Physicians' motivations are often misaligned with optimal patient care due to malpractice concerns.

    Conclusions:

    • Physicians, patients, and society are negatively impacted by defensive medicine.
    • Alternative strategies focusing on improved communication, risk management, and tort reform are necessary.
    • Organized medicine should actively promote these alternatives to minimize malpractice-related healthcare issues.
    Keywords:
    Health Care and Public HealthLegal ApproachProfessional Patient Relationship

    Related Experiment Videos