Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 30, 2026
Control of Eating Behavior Using a Novel Feedback System
Published on: May 8, 2018
Kellogg grant fuses quality and delivery: a prototype program to fit many settings
Abstract:
Just as any business enterprise involving many personal interactions, group practice medicine can suffer from organizational parallax, narrowed by time, and resulting from one-sided views of its own decision-making. Indeed, that is why accreditation reviews of groups take into account broad happenings within a medical practice as observed by outsiders. Aside from the all-important medical record, source materials for such reviews include questionnaires on the logical processes of care, educational activities of the staff in all departments, technological support, ethical considerations and overall environment. This article takes a look at quality assurance-in an innovative form--within group practice. The type of program detailed in it was first put to the test in 1975, by the St. Louis Park Medical Center, Minneapolis, in conjunction with a grant from the W. K. Kellogg Foundation to St. Louis Park, and to the Minneapolis-based firm InterStudy.
Insights
Group medical practices can improve decision-making by addressing organizational parallax through external reviews. This quality assurance program uses questionnaires and assesses various practice aspects for better outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Healthcare Management
- Medical Practice Administration
- Quality Assurance in Medicine
Background:
- Group medical practices face challenges like organizational parallax and limited perspectives in decision-making.
- External accreditation reviews are crucial for assessing a medical practice's overall functioning.
- Review materials include patient care processes, staff education, technology, ethics, and practice environment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore an innovative approach to quality assurance within group medical practices.
- To highlight methods for overcoming organizational limitations in healthcare settings.
Main Methods:
- The article details a quality assurance program implemented in 1975.
- The program involved external assessment of various practice components.
- Source materials for reviews included questionnaires and observations.
Main Results:
- The program aimed to provide a broader, external perspective on practice operations.
- It emphasized a comprehensive review beyond just medical records.
- The initiative sought to improve the logical processes of care and overall environment.
Conclusions:
- Innovative quality assurance programs can mitigate organizational parallax in group practices.
- External reviews provide valuable insights for enhancing healthcare delivery.
- Continuous assessment of practice operations is key to maintaining high standards.
