Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Guidelines for reviewing applications for privileges.

T C Shields

    The Hospital Medical Staff
    |August 9, 1980
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Hospital governing bodies have the final say on medical staff appointments, but the medical staff

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Interview with Thomas C. Shields, Esq.

    Quality management in health care·1999
    Same author

    The public charity status of hospitals and health care organizations under the "operated in connection with" relationship test of Section 509(a)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Tax Advisory Group, Office of Legal and Regulatory Affairs, American Hospital Association.

    Journal of health and hospital law : a publication of the American Academy of Hospital Attorneys of the American Hospital Association·1988
    Same author

    Protecting confidential patient records: what is the hospital's duty?

    Hospital progress·1982
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Healthcare Administration
    • Medical Staffing
    • Hospital Management

    Background:

    • Hospital governing bodies hold ultimate authority for medical staff appointments.
    • Medical staff members significantly influence the decision-making process for new appointments.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To emphasize the critical role of medical staff in evaluating applications.
    • To highlight the importance of rigorous review for maintaining high performance standards.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of hospital administrative and medical staff appointment protocols.
    • Analysis of the decision-making hierarchy in medical staff credentialing.

    Main Results:

    • Medical staff actively participate in and influence appointment decisions.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Critical evaluation of applications by medical staff is essential for quality assurance.

    • Conclusions:

    • While governing bodies grant final approval, medical staff input is crucial for effective credentialing.
    • Thorough review by medical staff ensures the maintenance of high professional standards.