Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Multimethod study of clinical judgment.

P E Johnson, F Hassebrock, A S Duran

    Organizational Behavior and Human Performance
    |September 8, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary

    Expert and novice clinicians differ in congenital heart disease diagnosis. Expertise influences how clinicians interpret patient data and their reasoning processes when evaluating simulated cases.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Rapid characterization of folding and binding interactions with thermolabile ligands by DSC.

    Chemical communications (Cambridge, England)·2016
    Same author

    The effect of thermal processing on the behaviour of peanut allergen peptide targets used in multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry experiments.

    The Analyst·2016
    Same author

    The challenge of logotherapy.

    Journal of religion and health·2014
    Same author

    The emotional health of the clergy.

    Journal of religion and health·2014
    Same author

    What can we believe in?

    Journal of religion and health·2014
    Same author

    The church's mission to mental health.

    Journal of religion and health·2014

    Area of Science:

    • Medical education
    • Clinical reasoning
    • Cardiology

    Background:

    • Congenital heart disease (CHD) diagnosis requires complex clinical reasoning.
    • Understanding how expertise influences diagnostic judgment is crucial for medical training.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate differences in diagnostic reasoning between expert and novice clinicians when evaluating congenital heart disease cases.
    • To identify how specific patient data cues influence clinical judgments.

    Main Methods:

    • Simulated congenital heart disease cases were presented to clinicians of varying expertise levels.
    • Clinicians provided thinking-aloud protocols during case evaluation.
    • Statistical analyses (ANOVAs) were used to compare disease judgments and cue utilization.

    Main Results:

    • Significant differences were observed in the use of critical cues and cue combinations between expert and novice clinicians.
    • Expert clinicians demonstrated distinct interpretations of patient data cues compared to novices.
    • Qualitatively different lines of reasoning were identified based on clinician expertise.

    Conclusions:

    • Clinical expertise significantly impacts the interpretation of patient data and diagnostic reasoning in congenital heart disease.
    • Training should focus on developing sophisticated cue interpretation and reasoning strategies for effective CHD diagnosis.

    Related Experiment Videos