Related Experiment Videos
Summary
A study found that many clinical thermometers failed to meet voluntary standards. Excluding minor issues like markings, most thermometers still met accuracy requirements.
Area of Science:
- Medical Device Standards
- Clinical Thermometry
- Quality Assurance
Background:
- Voluntary standards are crucial for medical device safety and efficacy.
- The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) evaluates the applicability of these standards.
- Ensuring clinical thermometers meet established benchmarks is vital for accurate patient temperature readings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the conformity of clinical thermometers to the ANSI/ASTM E 667-79 voluntary standard.
- To determine the feasibility and reasonableness of applying this standard to marketed devices.
- To identify specific areas where clinical thermometers fail to meet standard requirements.
Main Methods:
- Testing of 149 maximum self-registering, mercury-in-glass clinical thermometers from eight manufacturers.
- Adherence to the test methods and requirements outlined in ANSI/ASTM E 667-79.
- Analysis of failure rates based on different criteria, including accuracy and markings.
Main Results:
- 42% of fever thermometers and 100% of basal thermometers failed to meet at least one requirement of the standard.
- Excluding graduation marks and identification requirements, failure rates decreased to 14% for fever and 8% for basal thermometers.
- Thermometers failing accuracy requirements were only slightly out of compliance, by 0.1°F.
Conclusions:
- A significant percentage of clinical thermometers do not fully comply with ANSI/ASTM E 667-79.
- The standard's requirements for markings and identification contribute substantially to failure rates.
- Most clinical thermometers demonstrate acceptable accuracy, with minor deviations when failures occur.