Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Acquisition alternatives for capital equipment.

S B Burrows

    Pathologist
    |April 11, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary

    Laboratory directors face high equipment costs and rapid obsolescence. This article reviews five capital equipment acquisition methods for hospital labs, detailing pros and cons for informed decision-making.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Effect of long-term, continuous oxygen therapy in patients with severe chronic hypercapnia.

    The American review of respiratory disease·1973
    Same author

    Eosinophilic granuloma of the lung.

    The Journal-lancet·1961
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Healthcare Administration
    • Laboratory Management
    • Medical Technology

    Background:

    • High capital costs for laboratory equipment pose a significant challenge.
    • Rapid technological advancements lead to frequent equipment obsolescence.
    • Efficient acquisition strategies are crucial for hospital laboratories.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To review and analyze various mechanisms for acquiring capital equipment in hospital laboratories.
    • To provide laboratory directors with an understanding of different acquisition options.
    • To highlight the advantages and disadvantages of each acquisition method.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of five distinct capital equipment acquisition mechanisms.
    • Analysis of the benefits and drawbacks associated with each method.
    • Discussion tailored for hospital laboratory directors.

    Main Results:

    • Identification of five primary methods for capital equipment acquisition.
    • Detailed comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of each mechanism.
    • Insights into cost-effectiveness and operational suitability.

    Conclusions:

    • Awareness of diverse acquisition alternatives is essential for laboratory directors.
    • Strategic selection of equipment acquisition can mitigate costs and obsolescence issues.
    • Informed choices support sustainable laboratory operations and technological integration.

    Related Experiment Videos