Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

A simple technique for collecting, analyzing, and interpreting evaluative data.

H B Slotnick

    Evaluation & the Health Professions
    |August 9, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The epidemiology of physician learning.

    Medical teacher·2002
    Same author

    How doctors learn: education and learning across the medical-school-to-practice trajectory.

    Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2001
    Same author

    Changes in learning-resource use across physicians' learning episodes.

    Bulletin of the Medical Library Association·2001
    Same author

    Physicians' learning strategies.

    Chest·2000
    Same author

    Predictors of success in undergraduate human physiology.

    The American journal of physiology·2000
    Same author

    How doctors learn: physicians' self-directed learning episodes.

    Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·1999
    Same journal

    The "Twilight Zone" Is a Danger Zone: Why the Occupational-Clinical Divide in Burnout Assessment Is a False Dichotomy.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    Same journal

    Evaluating Equity in AI-Supported Functional Assessment: Agreement Between Clinician Judgment and Digital Metrics in Stroke Rehabilitation.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    Same journal

    Psychometric Properties of the Arabic Version of the PROMIS Sleep Disturbance 8b Short Form Among Nurses.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    Same journal

    Commentary: Systemic Inequities in Japan's Technical Intern Training Program (TITP): Health, Labor, and Legal Vulnerabilities of Foreign Trainees.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    Same journal

    Application of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements in Traditional Chinese Medicine Clinical Trials for Musculoskeletal Disorders in China: A Registry-Based Analysis.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    Same journal

    Divergent Socioeconomic Pathways to Biologically Uncontrolled Diabetes by Gender: A Bayesian Analysis of NHANES 2021-2023.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    See all related articles
    JoVE
    x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
    ABOUT JoVE
    OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
    AUTHORS
    Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
    LIBRARIANS
    TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
    RESEARCH
    JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
    EDUCATION
    JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
    Terms & Conditions of Use
    Privacy Policy
    Policies

    Best Liked/Least Liked (BL/LL) offers a simple yet flexible method for evaluation. This technique efficiently collects and analyzes data for achievement testing and measuring effects, even unintended outcomes.

    Area of Science:

    • Evaluation Methods
    • Psychometrics
    • Educational Assessment

    Background:

    • Traditional evaluation techniques can be complex and time-consuming.
    • There is a need for flexible and accessible methods in data collection for assessments.
    • Measuring both intended and unintended outcomes is crucial in many evaluation contexts.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To describe the Best Liked/Least Liked (BL/LL) technique for information collection in evaluations.
    • To highlight the ease of use and flexibility of the BL/LL method.
    • To present examples of BL/LL application in diverse evaluative scenarios.

    Main Methods:

    • The Best Liked/Least Liked (BL/LL) technique involves distinct stages: data collection, data analysis, and data interpretation.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • The method is characterized by its straightforward implementation across these stages.
  • Flexibility in applicability and scope allows for varied research designs.

    • Main Results:

    • The BL/LL technique proves easy to accomplish across its defined stages.
    • The method demonstrates flexibility in application, suitable for achievement testing and measuring effects.
    • BL/LL can be used for narrowly focused evaluations or to capture unintended outcomes.

    Conclusions:

    • The Best Liked/Least Liked (BL/LL) technique is a valuable, user-friendly tool for evaluative research.
    • Its adaptability makes it suitable for a wide range of assessment and measurement purposes.
    • BL/LL facilitates the efficient collection of data on both intended and unintended outcomes.