Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Quality assurance and program evaluation.

F Baker

    Evaluation & the Health Professions
    |May 11, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Quality assurance and program evaluation are distinct yet related healthcare accountability methods. This study examines their differences, similarities, and potential integration for improved public health assessment.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Quality of life and social support of patients being evaluated for bone marrow transplantation.

    Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings·2013
    Same author

    The development of a community mental health ideology scale.

    Community mental health journal·2013
    Same author

    An open-systems approach to the study of mental hospitals in transition.

    Community mental health journal·2013
    Same author

    Community mental health ideology, dogmatism, and political-economic conservatism.

    Community mental health journal·2013
    Same author

    Family caregivers and indicators of cancer-related distress.

    Psychology, health & medicine·2011
    Same author

    Cell-kinetics and the in-vivo vs in-vitro response of human tumors to chemotherapy drugs - a commentary.

    Oncology reports·2011
    Same journal

    The "Twilight Zone" Is a Danger Zone: Why the Occupational-Clinical Divide in Burnout Assessment Is a False Dichotomy.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    Same journal

    Evaluating Equity in AI-Supported Functional Assessment: Agreement Between Clinician Judgment and Digital Metrics in Stroke Rehabilitation.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    Same journal

    Psychometric Properties of the Arabic Version of the PROMIS Sleep Disturbance 8b Short Form Among Nurses.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    Same journal

    Commentary: Systemic Inequities in Japan's Technical Intern Training Program (TITP): Health, Labor, and Legal Vulnerabilities of Foreign Trainees.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    Same journal

    Application of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements in Traditional Chinese Medicine Clinical Trials for Musculoskeletal Disorders in China: A Registry-Based Analysis.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    Same journal

    Divergent Socioeconomic Pathways to Biologically Uncontrolled Diabetes by Gender: A Bayesian Analysis of NHANES 2021-2023.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Healthcare Management
    • Public Health Policy
    • Program Evaluation

    Background:

    • Increasing focus on healthcare quality assurance and program evaluation in the US.
    • These accountability measures have historically developed independently.
    • Resulting in distinct but related approaches to healthcare assessment.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To discuss the similarities and differences between quality assurance and program evaluation.
    • To examine their definitions, data collection, and utilization approaches.
    • To explore pressures and evidence for integrating these two assessment activities.

    Main Methods:

    • Comparative analysis of quality assurance and program evaluation frameworks.
    • Review of existing literature on healthcare accountability measures.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of current trends and future directions in public health assessment.

    • Main Results:

    • Quality assurance and program evaluation share common goals but differ in scope and methodology.
    • Data collection and utilization strategies present both divergence and convergence points.
    • There are increasing pressures and observable trends towards integrating these assessment types.

    Conclusions:

    • Integration of quality assurance and program evaluation can enhance healthcare accountability.
    • Future roles for states and localities in overseeing these integrated systems are crucial.
    • A unified approach may lead to more effective public health outcomes.