Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Fair use versus fair return: copyright legislation and its consequences.

I L Horowitz, M E Curtis

    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. American Society for Information Science
    |February 10, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary

    The fair use doctrine in copyright law creates complex issues, especially with new technologies. Curtailing fair use and using technology to track secondary use could benefit authors, publishers, and librarians.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Nanomechanical properties of a Ni nanodot-patterned surface.

    Nanotechnology·2011
    Same author

    The politics of physiological psychology. Ivan Pavlov's suppressed defense of scientific freedom and its consequences.

    Integrative physiological and behavioral science : the official journal of the Pavlovian Society·1993
    Same author

    Collagenase activity in colonic mucosa during inflammatory bowel disease.

    Clinical biochemistry·1987
    Same author

    Behavioral sciences: benign neglect?

    Science (New York, N.Y.)·1986
    Same author

    Field access.

    Science (New York, N.Y.)·1984
    Same author

    Control of ph.d. Programs.

    Science (New York, N.Y.)·1983

    Area of Science:

    • Intellectual Property Law
    • Information Science
    • Technology Law

    Background:

    • The Copyright Act of 1976 established the concept of fair use.
    • Technological advancements like xerography and online databases have complicated copyright.
    • Fair use has become a contentious issue within copyright law.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To examine the consequences of legally recognizing fair use.
    • To analyze how fair use interacts with technological growth and copyright law.
    • To propose solutions for safeguarding copyright holders' rights and ensuring information flow.

    Main Methods:

    • Legal analysis of the Copyright Act of 1976.
    • Examination of technological impacts on copyright exemptions.
    • Argumentative analysis of the fair use doctrine's effects.

    Main Results:

    • Legislative recognition of fair use, alongside technological growth, has led to unintended exemptions.
    • Fair use currently obscures the issue of fair return for intellectual property.
    • The current system presents challenges for copyright holders, authors, and publishers.

    Conclusions:

    • Eliminating or reducing fair use, coupled with technological tracking of secondary use, could benefit the knowledge industry.
    • Authors could receive appropriate royalties, and publishers might lower prices.
    • Librarians could be freed from administrative burdens related to usage monitoring and fee determination.

    Related Experiment Videos