Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Community antenatal care--a local study.

S Field, J Draper, H Thomas

    Health Trends
    |July 9, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Resistance of Arctic phytoplankton to ocean acidification and enhanced irradiance.

    Polar biology·2020
    Same author

    Recommendations for the Analysis of Hemocyte-related Immunocompetent Oxidative Activity in the Freshwater Snail Activity in the Freshwater Snail <i>Lymnaea Stagnalis</i>.

    Journal of xenobiotics·2019
    Same author

    Coagulopathy, cryoprecipitate and CRYOSTAT-2: realising the potential of a nationwide trauma system for a national clinical trial.

    British journal of anaesthesia·2019
    Same author

    Epidemiological Data on Anaphylaxis in French Emergency Departments.

    Journal of investigational allergology & clinical immunology·2018
    Same author

    Acquired cancer resistance to combination immunotherapy from transcriptional loss of class I HLA.

    Nature communications·2018
    Same author

    Validation of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nomogram to detect non-sentinel lymph node metastases in a United Kingdom cohort.

    Il Giornale di chirurgia·2018
    Same journal

    On the state of the public health.

    Health trends·1994
    Same journal

    Maternity services for drug misusers in England and Wales: a national survey.

    Health trends·1994
    Same journal

    Dentists' responses to drug misusers.

    Health trends·1994
    Same journal

    Leg ulcer care: an audit of cost-effectiveness.

    Health trends·1994
    Same journal

    Deliberate self harm: the hidden population.

    Health trends·1994
    Same journal

    Children with asthma in schools: an opportunity for "healthy alliances" between health and education authorities.

    Health trends·1994
    See all related articles

    Views from general practitioners and midwives on shared antenatal care highlight significant local variations in organization, policy, professional roles, and collaboration. These differences impact the delivery of coordinated maternal healthcare services.

    Area of Science:

    • Healthcare Delivery
    • Maternal Health
    • Primary Care

    Background:

    • Shared antenatal care models aim to integrate primary and specialist obstetric services.
    • Effective collaboration between general practitioners and midwives is crucial for optimal patient outcomes.
    • Understanding professional perspectives is key to improving care coordination.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explore general practitioners' and midwives' views on shared antenatal care.
    • To identify variations in the organization and implementation of shared antenatal care.
    • To assess factors influencing communication and cooperation in antenatal care.

    Main Methods:

    • Qualitative study involving interviews with healthcare professionals.
    • Data collected from 16 general practitioners and 14 midwives.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis focused on perceived differences in care models and professional interactions.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant local variations were found in the organization and policies governing shared antenatal care.
    • Differences were noted in the defined roles of general practitioners and midwives.
    • Levels of communication and cooperation between professionals varied considerably across different practice settings.

    Conclusions:

    • Shared antenatal care is implemented inconsistently, leading to diverse professional experiences.
    • Addressing organizational and role-related differences is essential for enhancing interprofessional collaboration.
    • Improving communication strategies can strengthen the effectiveness of shared antenatal care models.