Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Electrical stimulation of teeth.

B Matthews1, B N Searle

  • 1Department of Physiology (Oral Biology), University of Bristol, Medical School, University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TD. Great Britain.

Pain
|September 1, 1976
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Air quality assessment of a mass deployment of microgrids.

The Science of the total environment·2024
Same author

Thalamocortical Projections Are Significantly Impaired in the R6/2 Mouse Model of Huntington's Disease.

eNeuro·2022
Same author

Management of complex ventral hernias: results of an international survey.

BJS open·2021
Same author

Bioactive compounds sourced from Terminalia spp. in bacterial malodour prevention: an effective alternative to chemical additives.

International journal of cosmetic science·2019
Same author

Inequality in access to hearing care for older adults in residential homes.

Journal of public health (Oxford, England)·2019
Same author

Humanitarianism in surgery.

Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery·2017
Same journal

Efficacy and effectiveness of melatonin for the management of musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of placebo and active controlled trials.

Pain·2026
Same journal

Predictive socio-cultural factors of pain intensity, disability, and quality of life in patients with nonspecific musculoskeletal pain: a prospective cohort study.

Pain·2026
Same journal

Reward-induced endogenous pain inhibition scales with action-outcome certainty in humans.

Pain·2026
Same journal

Training alpha to treat pain: dissociable pathways to analgesia.

Pain·2026
Same journal

Neurophysiological and psychophysical mechanisms associated with immersive virtual reality-induced hypoalgesia: a systematic review.

Pain·2026
Same journal

Dissociable peripheral and central mechanisms of monoacylglycerol lipase inhibition on pain- and depression-related behaviors in a rat model of neuropathic pain.

Pain·2026
See all related articles

This study discusses technical challenges in tooth stimulation for diagnosis and pain research. It finds bipolar stimulation offers no significant advantage over monopolar, and highlights the need for higher voltage stimulators.

Area of Science:

  • Dental research
  • Neuroscience
  • Biomedical engineering

Background:

  • Clinical diagnosis and pain research often require electrical stimulation of intact teeth.
  • Current stimulation methods face technical limitations, particularly regarding voltage requirements.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss the technical problems associated with electrical tooth stimulation.
  • To evaluate the efficacy of bipolar versus monopolar stimulation techniques.
  • To identify limitations in available stimulation instrumentation.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of technical challenges in electrical tooth stimulation.
  • Comparison of monopolar and bipolar stimulation approaches.
  • Analysis of voltage and current requirements for effective stimulation.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Bipolar stimulation provides no significant advantage over monopolar stimulation for most dental applications.
  • A 100 V constant current stimulator is adequate for monopolar stimulation of healthy teeth at threshold intensity with a large electrode.
  • Higher voltages are necessary for monopolar stimulation exceeding 150 µA and for bipolar stimulation, with no suitable instruments currently available.

Conclusions:

  • Existing electrical stimulators are insufficient for certain tooth stimulation protocols, particularly those requiring higher voltages.
  • Development of new, high-voltage constant current stimulators is needed for advanced dental diagnostic and pain research applications.
  • Circuits for isolated 100 V and 1 kV constant current stimulators are provided to address instrumentation gaps.