Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

A comparison of methods to approximate standard errors for complex survey data.

V L Burt, S B Cohen

Review of Public Data Use

|September 7, 1984

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Evaluation of a machine learning tool for the early identification of patients with undiagnosed psoriatic arthritis - A retrospective population-based study.

Journal of translational autoimmunity·2023

Same author

Assessing vaccine-mediated protection in an ultra-low dose <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> murine model.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2023

Same author

Correction to: PANLAR consensus statement on biosimilars.

Clinical rheumatology·2019

Same author

PANLAR consensus statement on biosimilars.

Clinical rheumatology·2019

Same author

Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of RSLV-132, an RNase-Fc fusion protein in systemic lupus erythematosus: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Lupus·2016

Same author

Subunit vaccine H56/CAF01 induces a population of circulating CD4 T cells that traffic into the Mycobacterium tuberculosis-infected lung.

Mucosal immunology·2016

Same journal

The health planners dilemma and the problem of aggregation bias--an irresolvable conflict.

Review of public data use·1984

Same journal

Issues in protecting confidentiality in national health statistics.

Review of public data use·1983

Same journal

An inventory of U.S. health care data bases.

Review of public data use·1983

Same journal

Health care data in the United States.

Review of public data use·1983

Same journal

Toward an inventory of U.S. health care data bases.

Review of public data use·1983

Same journal

Implications of recent mortality trends for the size and composition of the population over 65.

Review of public data use·1983

See all related articles

Estimating standard errors for complex survey data can be costly. This study compares three approximation methods—relative variance curves, average relative standard error, and average design effect—for accuracy and cost-effectiveness.

Area of Science:

Statistics
Survey Methodology
Data Analysis

Background:

Complex survey designs involve multistage sampling with stratification and clustering.
Standard simple random sampling assumptions do not apply, necessitating specialized variance estimation.
Software packages exist for variance estimation in complex survey data, using methods like balanced repeated replication, jackknife, and Taylor series linearization.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare the accuracy, computational and publishing costs, and ease of implementation of three alternative techniques for approximating standard errors.
To identify cost-effective methods for estimating standard errors in large-scale complex surveys.
To provide guidance on selecting appropriate standard error approximation methods.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

Comparison of three approximation techniques: relative variance curve, average relative standard error, and average design effect model.
Evaluation based on accuracy of standard error approximation.
Assessment of computational and publishing costs.
Consideration of ease of implementation for researchers.

Main Results:

The paper presents a comparative analysis of the three methods.
Findings detail the trade-offs between accuracy, cost, and implementation difficulty for each method.
Results guide the selection of the most suitable approximation technique based on specific survey needs.

Conclusions:

The study concludes that approximation methods offer viable alternatives to exact standard error calculations for complex surveys.
The choice of method depends on the balance between desired accuracy and resource constraints.
Recommendations are provided for practical application in survey data analysis.