Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

When it's cutback time at NIH...

Grantsmanship Center News

|April 10, 1985

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Federal funding cuts impacted a research team developing Alzheimer

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

[Analysis of the German state medical examination regarding psychiatrically relevant topics].

Der Nervenarzt·2016

Same author

Chemical composition and function of metapleural gland secretion of the ant,Crematogaster deformis smith (hymenoptera: Myrmicinae).

Journal of chemical ecology·2013

Same author

Creation and piloting of a new hospital capacity assessment tool in a major urban area.

Public health·2009

Same author

The effect of age on prostaglandin-synthesizing enzymes in the development of gingivitis.

Journal of periodontal research·2007

Same author

Attracting surgical residents.

Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons·2007

Same author

The right to die: an end of life question.

Quinnipiac health law journal·2005

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Medical Research
Health Policy

Background:

Federal funding for social programs is declining.
Research grants are subject to political and economic shifts.
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) plays a crucial role in funding scientific endeavors.

Purpose of the Study:

To illustrate the impact of federal funding cuts on scientific research.
To provide insights into the grant approval and denial process.
To highlight the human element in federal funding decisions.

Main Methods:

Case study of a specific research project.
Analysis of funding decisions by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

A promising research project for Alzheimer's disease treatments lost critical funding.
The NIH denied funds previously approved informally due to budget cutbacks.
The experience serves as a cautionary tale for grantseekers.

Conclusions:

Scientific progress, particularly in areas like Alzheimer's research, is vulnerable to federal budget fluctuations.
The NIH's funding decisions can have profound, immediate impacts on ongoing research.
Nonprofit organizations and researchers must navigate the complexities of federal funding with awareness of potential risks.