Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

A validity scale for the Sharp consumer satisfaction scales.

B A Tanner

    Evaluation and Program Planning
    |December 11, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Improving PC efficiency by accelerating hard drive performance.

    M.D. computing : computers in medical practice·1993
    Same author

    Automating reports with microsoft word.

    M.D. computing : computers in medical practice·1992
    Same author

    An MS-DOS program for certain computations for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale--Revised.

    Computer methods and programs in biomedicine·1991
    Same author

    Composite descriptions associated with rare MMPI two-point code types in an adult urban psychiatric setting: codes that involve scale 0.

    Journal of clinical psychology·1990
    Same author

    Composite descriptions associated with rare MMPI two-point code types: codes that involve scale 5.

    Journal of clinical psychology·1990
    Same author

    Psychological aspects of hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia.

    Birth defects original article series·1988
    Same journal

    Terms of whose reference? Commissioning, power, and the distribution of evaluative learning in development.

    Evaluation and program planning·2026
    Same journal

    Proposing an identity-in-context framework for culturally responsive evaluation.

    Evaluation and program planning·2026
    Same journal

    The Participatory Institutional Capacity Assessment and Learning (PICAL) index, its adaptation in the democratic republic of the congo, and lessons learned.

    Evaluation and program planning·2026
    Same journal

    Decolonizing evaluation education in South Africa: A reflective case study of master's curriculum reform through a Made-in-Africa evaluation lens.

    Evaluation and program planning·2026
    Same journal

    Program evaluation plan assessing African American male achievement at predominantly white institutions: New Jersey education opportunity fund.

    Evaluation and program planning·2026
    Same journal

    Cardiovascular screening in homeless outreach: An operationally-ethical protocol.

    Evaluation and program planning·2026
    See all related articles
    JoVE
    x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
    ABOUT JoVE
    OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
    AUTHORS
    Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
    LIBRARIANS
    TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
    RESEARCH
    JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
    EDUCATION
    JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
    Terms & Conditions of Use
    Privacy Policy
    Policies

    Researchers created a 5-item validity scale to address inflated consumer satisfaction scores for mental health services. This new scale accurately identifies true client satisfaction, improving data reliability in mental healthcare research.

    Area of Science:

    • Psychological assessment
    • Mental health services research
    • Survey methodology

    Background:

    • Consumer satisfaction surveys in mental health services often report inflated scores.
    • This inflation can hinder accurate assessment of service quality and client experiences.
    • A reliable method is needed to validate self-reported satisfaction data.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To develop and validate a brief scale to identify potentially inflated satisfaction scores.
    • To improve the accuracy of measuring true client satisfaction with mental health services.
    • To enhance the predictive validity of satisfaction questionnaires.

    Main Methods:

    • Development of a 5-item validity scale for the SHARP questionnaire.
    • Statistical analysis including discrimination tests and stepwise regression.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Application and derivation of validity weights across multiple experimental samples (N=38, 49, 26, 121).

    • Main Results:

    • The validity scale significantly discriminated between clients offering service improvement suggestions and those who did not (p < .001).
    • The scale improved the prediction of true client satisfaction scores from obtained scores (p < .01).
    • Application of derived weights significantly reduced deviation between obtained and true scores across multiple samples (p < .05).

    Conclusions:

    • The 5-item validity scale effectively addresses inflated consumer satisfaction scores in mental health.
    • This tool enhances the accuracy and reliability of mental health service evaluation.
    • The validated scale offers a robust method for assessing genuine client experiences.