Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Micromatrix. Computers, medicine, and quality control.

T M Grundner

    Health Matrix
    |January 5, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Medical software lacks clear information, hindering adoption. A voluntary review system by professional organizations is proposed to improve quality and accessibility for medical computing technologies.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Computerized health information networks: house calls of the future?

    Family medicine·1990
    Same author

    Public-access computing: a new medium for health information delivery.

    Topics in health record management·1987
    Same author

    An introduction to interactive videodisc technology: implications for medical education.

    Health matrix·1987
    Same author

    Interactive medical telecomputing. An alternative approach to community health education.

    The New England journal of medicine·1986
    Same author

    The greening of medical computing: federal policy and the information industry.

    Health matrix·1986
    Same author

    More on making consent forms more readable.

    IRB·1982
    Same journal

    Selected bibliography on quality of care.

    Health matrix·1990
    Same journal

    Computer-aided decisions for prospective hysterectomy screening.

    Health matrix·1990
    Same journal

    The value and need of more attention to end-results and follow-up in hospitals today. October 23, 1923.

    Health matrix·1990
    Same journal

    The continuous improvement of quality at the Hospital Corporation of America.

    Health matrix·1990
    Same journal

    Enumerative, Bayesian, and analytic statistical analysis of nosocomial infection for quality improvement: first of two parts.

    Health matrix·1990
    Same journal

    Use of a community task force by hospitals to improve systems of care.

    Health matrix·1990
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Informatics
    • Health Information Technology
    • Software Engineering

    Background:

    • The medical software landscape currently lacks transparency regarding product existence, function, procurement, and efficacy.
    • Existing regulatory oversight by a federal agency is perceived as underfunded and insufficient for effective review.
    • This situation parallels a hypothetical pharmaceutical industry with no product knowledge or quality control.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To highlight the critical need for a structured review process for medical software.
    • To propose a viable alternative to current inadequate regulatory mechanisms.
    • To advocate for enhanced quality and accessibility of medical computing technologies.

    Main Methods:

    • Comparative analysis of the current medical software market with a hypothetical, dysfunctional pharmaceutical industry.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessment of the limitations of existing federal regulatory oversight for medical devices and software.
  • Conceptualization of a private, voluntary review framework.

    • Main Results:

    • The current state of medical software is characterized by a significant lack of information and standardization.
    • Federal review agencies are under-resourced, limiting their effectiveness in ensuring software quality.
    • A gap exists in the market for reliable, accessible information on medical software.

    Conclusions:

    • Professional organizations with a focus on medical computing should establish a voluntary review function.
    • This private review initiative can address the deficiencies in current oversight and market transparency.
    • Implementing such a system will foster greater trust and facilitate the adoption of beneficial medical software.