Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Why doctors must secure informed patient consent.

L E Rozovsky, F A Rozovsky

    Health Care
    |November 6, 1987
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    US courts now hold hospitals, not doctors, responsible for patient consent. Canadian hospitals must establish clear consent-to-treatment policies to prevent similar legal challenges and ensure patient rights.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Strategies for reducing medical errors: HIM's role.

    Journal of AHIMA·2000
    Same author

    Ten risk management challenges for 2000.

    Hospitals & health networks·2000
    Same author

    Medicare fraud: it's time to take on a new role.

    Advance for nurse practitioners·1998
    Same author

    Compliance crosswalk: you're not off the hot seat.

    Hospital peer review·1998
    Same author

    Planning for a bomb threat.

    Journal of healthcare risk management : the journal of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management·1998
    Same author

    Don't rush your compliance plan.

    Hospital peer review·1997

    Area of Science:

    • Healthcare Law
    • Medical Ethics
    • Hospital Administration

    Background:

    • A recent U.S. court ruling has shifted the legal responsibility for obtaining patient consent from individual physicians to healthcare institutions.
    • This decision has significant implications for hospital liability and patient rights in medical treatment.
    • Understanding the legal precedent is crucial for healthcare providers and administrators.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze the implications of the U.S. court ruling on hospital responsibility for patient consent.
    • To provide recommendations for Canadian hospitals to proactively address consent-to-treatment policies.
    • To highlight the importance of clear policies in mitigating legal risks.

    Main Methods:

    • Legal analysis of the U.S. court decision.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparative review of existing consent-to-treatment policies in Canadian hospitals.
  • Risk assessment for Canadian healthcare institutions.

    • Main Results:

    • Hospitals, not doctors, are legally accountable for securing patient consent in the U.S.
    • Canadian hospitals currently lack uniform and explicit policies regarding hospital responsibility for consent.
    • Failure to establish clear policies could expose Canadian hospitals to significant legal risks.

    Conclusions:

    • Canadian hospitals should develop and implement comprehensive consent-to-treatment policies.
    • Proactive policy development is essential to align with evolving legal standards and protect both patients and institutions.
    • Clear policies reinforce ethical practice and reduce the likelihood of litigation.