Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Potential liability in utilization review.

The Medical Staff Counselor

|December 5, 1988

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Physicians face potential liability when utilization review decisions conflict with medical judgment. Prioritize necessary patient care based on clinical expertise, not third-party payer demands, to mitigate risks.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The tortuous history of the KYL amendment.

Health matrix (Cleveland, Ohio : 1991)·2001

Same author

Heterologous expression of a green fluorescent protein-pertussis toxin S1 subunit fusion construct disrupts calcium channel modulation in rat superior cervical ganglion neurons.

Neuroscience letters·1999

Same author

Antibodies to the chlamydial 60 kilodalton heat shock protein in women with tubal factor infertility.

Infectious diseases in obstetrics and gynecology·1998

Same author

Legal colloquium defines standards for tax-exempts.

Modern healthcare·1996

Same author

The Social Service Department Archives: Peking Union Medical College 1928-1951.

The American archivist·1996

Same author

The detection of adducts in human cervix tissue DNA using 32P-postlabelling: a study of the relationship with smoking history and oral contraceptive use.

Carcinogenesis·1994

Same journal

United States v. Levin: entrapment by estoppel doctrine applied in Medicare reimbursement context.

The Medical staff counselor·1994

Same journal

Challenges in medical staff credentialing.

The Medical staff counselor·1994

Same journal

Assessing the risks of managed care participation: a practical analysis.

The Medical staff counselor·1994

Same journal

Why the medical staff as we know it will cease to exist.

The Medical staff counselor·1994

Same journal

New guidelines for physician contracts with tax-exempt hospitals.

The Medical staff counselor·1994

Same journal

Medical staff contracting: legal issues in physician-hospital arrangements.

The Medical staff counselor·1994

See all related articles

Area of Science:

Healthcare law
Medical ethics
Health services research

Background:

Utilization review (UR) by third-party payers is increasingly influencing healthcare delivery.
Cost containment pressures drive UR activities, impacting clinical decision-making.
Potential conflicts arise between physician judgment and UR organization recommendations.

Purpose of the Study:

To examine the potential legal liability of physicians and utilization review organizations.
To analyze patient injury risks stemming from treatment disagreements.
To advocate for physician autonomy in medical decision-making.

Main Methods:

Literature review of legal precedents and ethical considerations.
Analysis of case studies involving utilization review disputes.

Related Experiment Videos

Discussion of physician responsibilities in patient care.

Main Results:

Physicians may face liability if UR decisions lead to patient harm.
Utilization review organizations also bear potential responsibility for adverse outcomes.
Discrepancies between medical necessity and UR criteria create significant risks.

Conclusions:

Physicians should adhere to their medical judgment when providing necessary services.
The findings underscore the importance of physician-patient relationship and clinical autonomy.
Navigating the complexities of utilization review requires careful consideration of legal and ethical implications.