Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Can systems measure quality?

J Christoffersson, C Moynihan

    Computers in Healthcare
    |March 10, 1988
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Administrative concerns drive the focus on healthcare quality. Ensuring cost containment does not compromise patient care quality is increasingly urgent.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Current perspectives on the surgical management of mandibular third molars in the United Kingdom: the need for further research.

    The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery·2020
    Same author

    Women's Free-text Comments on their Quality of Life: An Exploratory Analysis from the UK Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) Trials for Early Breast Cancer.

    Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))·2018
    Same author

    Ambiguity in a masculine world: Being a BRCA1/2 mutation carrier and a man with prostate cancer.

    Psycho-oncology·2017
    Same author

    Reproductive decision-making in young female carriers of a BRCA mutation.

    Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2013
    Same author

    Targeted prostate cancer screening in men with mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 detects aggressive prostate cancer: preliminary analysis of the results of the IMPACT study.

    BJU international·2010
    Same author

    Communicating genetics research results to families: problems arising when the patient participant is deceased.

    Psycho-oncology·2008
    Same journal

    CHIM (Center for Healthcare Information Management) survey shows confidence in EDI, CPR technologies.

    Computers in healthcare·1993
    Same journal

    Product overview hotlist. Integration tools.

    Computers in healthcare·1993
    Same journal

    Trend or fad? Acquisitions rock healthcare I/S industry.

    Computers in healthcare·1993
    Same journal

    Memorial Sloan-Kettering cures paperwork problems with document imaging.

    Computers in healthcare·1993
    Same journal

    Ten questions worth asking about mobile computing.

    Computers in healthcare·1993
    Same journal

    CIH survey confirms communications networks as vital healthcare technologies.

    Computers in healthcare·1993
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Healthcare Administration
    • Health Services Research
    • Quality Improvement

    Background:

    • The healthcare landscape is increasingly influenced by administrative directives.
    • Cost containment strategies are a significant focus in healthcare management.
    • There is a growing need to balance financial pressures with patient care standards.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To examine the administrative drivers behind the emphasis on healthcare quality.
    • To investigate the relationship between cost containment measures and quality of care.
    • To address the urgency of demonstrating that cost savings do not negatively impact patient outcomes.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of administrative policies and their impact on quality metrics.
    • Review of cost containment strategies within healthcare systems.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessment of quality assurance mechanisms in response to financial pressures.

    • Main Results:

    • Quality initiatives are largely propelled by administrative requirements.
    • Prospective payment systems and cost-saving pressures necessitate quality validation.
    • Evidence is required to confirm that financial efficiencies do not erode care quality.

    Conclusions:

    • Administrative concerns are the primary impetus for current quality improvement efforts in healthcare.
    • The implementation of cost containment measures mandates a rigorous evaluation of their effect on the quality of patient care.
    • Healthcare providers must proactively demonstrate that cost-saving initiatives are not detrimental to patient well-being.