Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Differential Leveling01:12

Differential Leveling

628
Differential leveling is a precise method in surveying used to determine the elevation difference between two points. Its primary goal is to establish accurate vertical measurements to create level surfaces or grade lines critical for designing and constructing infrastructures such as roads, bridges, and buildings.The procedure for differential leveling begins with setting up and leveling the instrument at a point where the benchmark can be seen. The level rod is held on the benchmark (BM), and...
628
Design Example: Maintaining Level of an Embankment01:19

Design Example: Maintaining Level of an Embankment

378
Constructing a roadway embankment over uneven terrain requires precise leveling to ensure stability and proper drainage. Surveyors use a leveling instrument and staff to calculate ground elevations and determine the required fill material at each point along the embankment alignment.The process begins by positioning a leveling instrument near a benchmark with a known elevation. A backsight reading establishes the instrument height, which serves as a reference for subsequent measurements. A...
378
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors01:17

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

366
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
366
Leveling Equipment01:18

Leveling Equipment

343
As leveling involves measuring vertical distances relative to a horizontal line of sight, it requires a graduated rod, called a level rod, for vertical measurements and an instrument called a level for a horizontal sight line. A level includes a high-powered telescope with a mechanism for leveling to ensure the line of sight is horizontal when the bubble in the spirit level is centered. Leveling rods, made of wood, metal, or fiberglass, are graduated in feet or meters and commonly used in two-...
343
Introduction and Methods of Leveling01:26

Introduction and Methods of Leveling

426
Leveling is a surveying procedure used to determine elevation differences between distant points. Elevation refers to the vertical distance above or below a reference datum, typically mean sea level (MSL). In the United States, elevations are often referenced to the mean sea level station at Father Point Rimouski along the St. Lawrence Seaway. To make the datum accessible, permanent markers are established throughout the region. These markers, called benchmarks, have known elevations. If the...
426
Leveling Effect01:29

Leveling Effect

1.3K
In acid-base chemistry, the leveling effect refers to the limitation imposed by the solvent on the strength of acids and bases in solution. When a base stronger than the solvent's conjugate base is used, it deprotonates the solvent until the base is entirely consumed, making it ineffective against weaker acids. Conversely, an acid stronger than the solvent's conjugate acid protonates the solvent until the acid is depleted, rendering it ineffective against weaker bases. Essentially, the...
1.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The need for reliable monitoring of workforce trends.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·1999
Same author

U.S. radiologists' workload in 1995-1996 and trends since 1991-1992.

Radiology·1999
Same author

Legislation that prohibits self-referral: is it really necessary under managed competition?

Radiology·1994
Same author

Digital radiography and conventional imaging of the chest: a comparison of observer performance.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·1994
Same author

Operating at the diagnostic margins: almost real-time interpretations.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·1994
Same author

Managed competition: implications for radiology.

Radiology·1993
Same journal

The importance of outcome.

Administrative radiology : AR·1995
Same journal

Educating doctors on educating patients.

Administrative radiology : AR·1995
Same journal

Rethinking patient education and support.

Administrative radiology : AR·1995
Same journal

The evolution of radiologic accreditation.

Administrative radiology : AR·1995
Same journal

Turning data into information: systems approach.

Administrative radiology : AR·1995
Same journal

Telephony--the science of communication.

Administrative radiology : AR·1995
See all related articles

Related Experiment Videos

Leveling the playing field.

W H Straub

    Administrative Radiology : AR
    |December 10, 1988
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    A relative value scale was applied to manage a large academic department. This approach aids in resource allocation and operational efficiency within academic medical settings.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Area of Science:

    • Health Management
    • Academic Medicine
    • Healthcare Administration

    Background:

    • Academic departments face complex management challenges.
    • Efficient resource allocation is crucial for departmental success.
    • Traditional management methods may not fully address academic specificities.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To describe the application of a relative value scale.
    • To evaluate its utility in managing a large academic department.
    • To provide a framework for improved departmental administration.

    Main Methods:

    • Implementation of a relative value scale system.
    • Data collection on departmental activities and resource utilization.
    • Analysis of the scale's impact on management decisions.

    Main Results:

    • Successful application of the relative value scale.
    • Demonstrated improvements in resource management.
    • Enhanced operational efficiency within the academic department.

    Conclusions:

    • Relative value scales are effective tools for academic department management.
    • This methodology supports data-driven decision-making.
    • The approach can be adapted for similar academic healthcare settings.