Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Resolving the abortion controversy.

J I Rosoff

    Health Matrix
    |February 3, 1990
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The Clinton health plan: what does it do for reproductive health services?

    Family planning perspectives·1994
    Same author

    The Supreme Court retreats another step on abortion.

    Family planning perspectives·1990
    Same author

    The Webster decision: a giant step backwards.

    Family planning perspectives·1989
    Same author

    Sex education in the schools: policies and practice.

    Family planning perspectives·1989
    Same author

    The politics of birth control.

    Family planning perspectives·1988
    Same author

    Taking family planning out of Title X: the impact of the proposed new regulations.

    Family planning perspectives·1987
    Same journal

    Selected bibliography on quality of care.

    Health matrix·1990
    Same journal

    Computer-aided decisions for prospective hysterectomy screening.

    Health matrix·1990
    Same journal

    The value and need of more attention to end-results and follow-up in hospitals today. October 23, 1923.

    Health matrix·1990
    Same journal

    The continuous improvement of quality at the Hospital Corporation of America.

    Health matrix·1990
    Same journal

    Enumerative, Bayesian, and analytic statistical analysis of nosocomial infection for quality improvement: first of two parts.

    Health matrix·1990
    Same journal

    Use of a community task force by hospitals to improve systems of care.

    Health matrix·1990
    See all related articles

    This article examines U.S. abortion laws, legislative challenges, and socioeconomic factors influencing abortion decisions. It also explores how better contraceptive access could impact abortion rates.

    Area of Science:

    • Public Health
    • Law and Medicine
    • Sociology

    Background:

    • The legal landscape surrounding abortion in the United States, particularly concerning legislative efforts to overturn Roe v. Wade, remains a critical area of public health and policy debate.
    • International comparisons of abortion laws highlight significant differences between the U.S. and other developed nations, raising questions about legal frameworks and access.
    • Socioeconomic factors are increasingly recognized as significant determinants influencing individuals' decisions regarding abortion.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze current legislative attempts to reverse Roe v. Wade and their potential impact on abortion access.
    • To compare U.S. abortion legislation and outcomes with those in other developed countries.
    • To investigate the role of socioeconomic factors in abortion decisions and explore the potential of enhanced contraceptive use to reduce abortion rates.
    Keywords:
    Abortion LawAbortion, Induced--legal aspectsAmericasContraceptionDeveloped CountriesEconomic FactorsFamily PlanningFertility Control, PostconceptionLegislationLow Income Population--womenNorth AmericaNorthern AmericaObstaclesOrganization And AdministrationPolitical FactorsSocial ClassSocioeconomic FactorsSocioeconomic StatusUnited States

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Methods:

    • Legislative analysis of U.S. abortion laws and relevant court decisions.
    • Comparative legal and public health data analysis between the U.S. and selected developed nations.
    • Socioeconomic data analysis to identify correlations with abortion rates.
    • Review of studies on contraceptive efficacy and uptake.

    Main Results:

    • Legislative actions in the U.S. are creating a complex and shifting legal environment for abortion.
    • Significant disparities exist between U.S. abortion laws and those in comparable developed nations.
    • Socioeconomic status demonstrably influences the circumstances and decisions surrounding abortion.
    • Improved access to and use of contraception show a strong potential to decrease unintended pregnancies and, consequently, abortion rates.

    Conclusions:

    • The reversal of Roe v. Wade has profound implications for reproductive rights and healthcare access in the U.S.
    • Policy interventions should consider both legal reforms and socioeconomic support to address abortion access.
    • Investing in comprehensive reproductive healthcare, including enhanced contraceptive services, is a viable strategy to reduce abortion incidence.