Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Physician countersuits--a solution to the malpractice dilemma?

J G Higgs

    Specialty Law Digest. Health Care (Monthly)
    |July 10, 1980
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same journal

    Of suicide machines, euthanasia legislation, and the health care crisis.

    Specialty law digest. Health care (Monthly)·1994
    Same journal

    The Pharmaceutical Access and Prudent Purchasing Act of 1990: Federal law shifts the duty to warn from the physician to the pharmacist.

    Specialty law digest. Health care (Monthly)·1993
    Same journal

    A competitive analysis of most favored nations clauses in contracts between health care providers and insurers.

    Specialty law digest. Health care (Monthly)·1991
    Same journal

    Hospital medical staff privilege issues: "brother's keeper" revisited.

    Specialty law digest. Health care (Monthly)·1991
    Same journal

    A cost containment malpractice defense: implications for the standard of care and for indigent patients.

    Specialty law digest. Health care (Monthly)·1991
    Same journal

    Hospital liability for defamation of character during the peer review process: sticks and stones may break my bones, but words may cost me my job.

    Specialty law digest. Health care (Monthly)·1991
    See all related articles

    Physicians are shifting from passivity to activism, using countersuits for malicious prosecution, abuse of process, or defamation. This explores the impact of malpractice and countersuits on the medical field.

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Law
    • Legal Medicine
    • Physician Advocacy

    Background:

    • Physicians historically faced malpractice suits with apprehension.
    • A shift towards physician activism is now evident in legal responses.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explore the origins and consequences of medical malpractice lawsuits.
    • To examine physician countersuit strategies and their efficacy.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of legal precedents and physician activism trends.
    • Analysis of malpractice and countersuit case law.

    Main Results:

    • Countersuits, often alleging malicious prosecution, defamation, or abuse of process, are increasing.
    • The study examines the positive and negative effects of malpractice suits.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Conclusions:

    • Physician countersuits represent a new form of activism in response to malpractice litigation.
    • The effectiveness of countersuits in resolving the malpractice issue requires further evaluation.