Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Should we ration health care?

N S Jecker1

  • 1Department of Medical History and Ethics, University of Washington, Seattle.

The Journal of Medical Humanities
|March 5, 1990
PubMed
Summary

Healthcare funding allocation necessitates rationing. This paper critiques age-based rationing proposals and advocates for a right to a decent minimum standard of care for all.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Religion Welcome Here: A Pluriversal Approach to Religion and Global Bioethics.

Journal of bioethical inquiry·2024
Same author

Dividing loyalties: caring for individuals and populations.

Yale journal of health policy, law, and ethics·2003
Same author

Uncovering cultural bias in ethics consultation.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2002
Same author

Abuse of futility.

Archives of internal medicine·2001
Same author

Managed care: a house of mirrors.

The Journal of clinical ethics·1998
Same author

Principles and methods of ethical decision making in critical care nursing.

Critical care nursing clinics of North America·1997

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Health Economics
  • Public Health Policy

Background:

  • Distinguishes between resource allocation (across categories) and rationing (within categories).
  • Current healthcare funding structures make rationing inevitable.
  • Examines existing proposals for age-based rationing of life-extending medical care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the inevitability of rationing in healthcare due to funding allocation.
  • To critically evaluate arguments for age-based rationing by Callahan and Daniels.
  • To propose an alternative framework for healthcare rights.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of resource distribution.
  • Critical review of ethical arguments for age rationing.
  • Development of a rights-based approach to healthcare access.

Main Results:

  • Current healthcare funding inherently leads to rationing.
  • Arguments supporting age-based rationing are found to be unconvincing.
  • An alternative ethical framework emphasizes a right to a decent minimum of healthcare.

Conclusions:

  • Rationing is an unavoidable consequence of healthcare funding allocation.
  • Age-based rationing proposals lack sufficient justification.
  • Establishing a right to a decent minimum of healthcare offers a more equitable approach.

Related Experiment Videos