Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Selecting laboratory instrumentation. Part I.

R P De Cresce, M S Lifshitz

    MLO: Medical Laboratory Observer
    |January 9, 1989
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Financial justification of alternate site testing.

    Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·1995
    Same author

    Managed care and the hospital laboratory: survival of the fittest.

    Clinical laboratory management review : official publication of the Clinical Laboratory Management Association·1994
    Same author

    PCR (polymerase chain reaction) and the future of molecular testing.

    MLO: medical laboratory observer·1993
    Same author

    Selecting instruments with an eye to CLIA.

    MLO: medical laboratory observer·1992
    Same author

    Enhance laboratory workflow to save steps and money.

    MLO: medical laboratory observer·1992
    Same author

    Automated immunoassay systems: a new frontier.

    MLO: medical laboratory observer·1990
    Same journal

    Patient Safety Monitoring in International Laboratories.

    MLO: medical laboratory observer·2026
    Same journal

    Taking issue with some OIG recommendations.

    MLO: medical laboratory observer·2018
    Same journal

    PCR then and now Improvements to technologies expand clinical utilization.

    MLO: medical laboratory observer·2018
    Same journal

    Outsourcing vs. insourcing Which strategy is the better way for labs to support their larger institution?

    MLO: medical laboratory observer·2018
    Same journal

    The autoimmune response and neuropsychiatric disorders.

    MLO: medical laboratory observer·2018
    Same journal

    Pathogen discovery through deep sequencing.

    MLO: medical laboratory observer·2018
    See all related articles

    Lab operational efficiency can be improved by analyzing current technology and workflows. This assessment helps determine if new instruments or procedural changes are needed for better performance.

    Area of Science:

    • Laboratory operations
    • Scientific workflow analysis
    • Technology assessment

    Background:

    • Optimizing laboratory operations is crucial for research efficiency and resource management.
    • Existing technologies and workflows may not align with current scientific demands.
    • Identifying bottlenecks requires systematic evaluation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the impact of technology and workflow analysis on laboratory operations.
    • To provide a framework for labs to assess their needs for new instrumentation or process improvements.

    Main Methods:

    • Conducting a thorough analysis of existing laboratory technologies.
    • Mapping and evaluating current operational workflows.
    • Benchmarking performance against industry standards.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Identified specific areas where technology upgrades could enhance throughput.
    • Workflow analysis revealed inefficiencies in sample processing.
    • Data-driven insights guided decisions on capital equipment acquisition.

    Conclusions:

    • Systematic analysis of technology and workflow is essential for optimizing laboratory performance.
    • Informed decisions regarding instrumentation and operational changes lead to improved efficiency and productivity.