Related Experiment Videos
Planning for alternative futures in the NHS
Health Services Management Research
|February 9, 1988
Summary
This study investigates why some UK health districts change faster than others by analyzing strategic planning and local learning. It reveals a uniform, top-down agenda alongside emergent local adaptation in healthcare management.
Area of Science:
- Healthcare Management
- Organizational Change
- Public Policy Analysis
Background:
- The UK National Health Service (NHS) faces challenges in rapid adaptation, as highlighted by The Griffiths Report (1983).
- Previous research identified "strategic intent" implementation as a critical issue for NHS managers.
- A need exists to understand variations in the pace of change across different Health Districts.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the content of the change agenda within the NHS.
- To analyze the nature of the planning process in achieving strategic change.
- To identify factors influencing the rate of change in Health Districts.
Main Methods:
- Historical analysis of local systems' evolution over time.
- Longitudinal study of strategic change within the NHS.
- Case study approach involving ten English Health Districts across acute and priority sectors.
Main Results:
- A high rate of change is projected in current strategic plans, potentially revising incrementalist change models.
- Regional change agendas largely reflect uniform national/central policies (e.g., RAWP, DGH network construction, mental illness hospital rundown).
- Alongside top-down planning, a "local learning" approach emerges, focusing on "problem-sensing" and agenda-setting.
Conclusions:
- Healthcare change in the NHS is driven by both uniform national policies and localized adaptive planning.
- Understanding "local learning" is crucial for effective strategic change implementation in healthcare.
- Variations in change rates may be linked to the interplay between centralized directives and decentralized responsiveness.