Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Due process. Part 1: the physician's right to due process and equal protection.

A F Southwick

    The Hospital Medical Staff
    |April 12, 1978
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Quality assurance in health care. Confidentiality of information and immunity for participants.

    The Journal of legal medicine·1984
    Same author

    Hospital liability. Two theories have been merged.

    The Journal of legal medicine·1983
    Same author

    The physician's right to due process in public and private hospitals: is there a difference?

    Medicolegal news·1981
    Same author

    Due process. Part 2: The elusive concept of procedural due process.

    The Hospital medical staff·1978
    Same author

    When exclusive service contracts go to court.

    Trustee : the journal for hospital governing boards·1977
    Same author

    Medical staff privileges: a matter of fairness.

    Trustee : the journal for hospital governing boards·1976
    Same journal

    Enhancing hospital financial viability under PPS: a strategy for physicians.

    The Hospital medical staff·1985
    Same journal

    New medical staff members made 'members of family'.

    The Hospital medical staff·1985
    Same journal

    Advantages of collective bargaining contracts for residents exist but have declined.

    The Hospital medical staff·1985
    Same journal

    New artificial intelligence systems critique physicians.

    The Hospital medical staff·1984
    Same journal

    Nothing ventured, nothing gained.

    The Hospital medical staff·1984
    Same journal

    The lure of risk-sharing arrangements. Interview by Emily Friedman.

    The Hospital medical staff·1984
    See all related articles

    State courts are protecting physicians' rights to due process and equal protection in hospital appointments and privileges. Decisions target unreasonable rules, with this article focusing on hospital regulations governing physician rights and duties.

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Law
    • Healthcare Administration
    • Legal Rights

    Background:

    • Physicians' professional rights are subject to hospital regulations.
    • Legal challenges concerning staff appointments and clinical privileges are increasing.
    • Ensuring fairness in hospital governance is crucial for medical professionals.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To examine the legal basis for physicians' rights to due process and equal protection.
    • To analyze court decisions impacting hospital rules on staff appointments and clinical privileges.
    • To clarify the regulatory landscape for physician rights within healthcare institutions.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of state court decisions.
    • Analysis of legal precedents concerning hospital bylaws and policies.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of case law related to arbitrary and capricious administrative actions.

    • Main Results:

    • State courts consistently uphold physicians' rights to due process and equal protection.
    • Judicial review frequently targets hospital rules deemed unreasonable, arbitrary, or capricious.
    • This article delineates the scope of hospital rules affecting individual physician rights and duties.

    Conclusions:

    • Physicians possess legally protected rights regarding hospital appointments and privileges.
    • The judiciary serves as a safeguard against arbitrary hospital regulations.
    • Understanding these rights and regulations is essential for healthcare providers.