Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Anticipation versus results: an approach to improved program forecasting.

F H Mitchell

    American Journal of Health Planning
    |March 13, 1978
    PubMed
    Summary

    Current health program planning relies heavily on subjective insights, leading to failures and unintended consequences. New systematic approaches are needed to improve health planning, decision-making, and program impact analysis for better public health outcomes.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A comparison of phasic cardiac responses derived from the electrocardiogram and the peripheral pulse.

    International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology·1987
    Same author

    Options for America: international hospital literature offers insight, possible approaches to American problems.

    Hospital forum·1981
    Same author

    Entering the 1980s: the health care system and primary care.

    Family & community health·1980
    Same author

    Health planning in the United States.

    World hospitals·1980
    Same author

    Development, application, and evaluation of an "action-reaction" planning method.

    Academy of management review. Academy of Management·1979

    Area of Science:

    • Health Services Research
    • Public Health Policy
    • Program Planning and Evaluation

    Background:

    • Health program design and legislation drafting heavily involve health planners.
    • Current planning guidance often relies on individual beliefs and limited data, rather than systematic analysis.
    • Existing impact prediction techniques are insufficient, leading to planning failures and unpredicted side effects.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To highlight the need for improved approaches in health program planning and decision-making.
    • To address the limitations of current methods that result in planning failures and negative consequences.
    • To explore a conceptual framework for studying health planning, decision-making, and implementation processes.

    Main Methods:

    • The study reviews historical approaches to health program planning.
    • It identifies limitations in current impact prediction techniques and decision-making processes.
    • A conceptual approach for analyzing the potential impact of health program changes is proposed.

    Main Results:

    • Traditional health planning methods often result in significant, unpredicted side effects.
    • These failures can undermine the credibility of decision-makers and public trust in health programs.
    • There is a clear need for more systematic methods to analyze the impact of program changes.

    Conclusions:

    • Improved guidance for health decision-makers requires a deeper understanding of planning processes.
    • New analytical approaches are essential to mitigate risks associated with health program changes.
    • Further study of planning, decision-making, and implementation is crucial for effective public health initiatives.

    Related Experiment Videos