Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Risk differential between Medicare beneficiaries enrolled and not enrolled in an HMO
Abstract:
Medicare provides incentive reimbursements to health maintenance organizations (HMOs) which enroll Medicare beneficiaries on a risk option and provide care at a lower cost than expected. The incentive reimbursements are tied to an actuarial calculation of Medicare Adjusted Average Per Capita Cost (AAPCC). The AAPCC adjusts for a number of variables which affect Medicare reimbursements and for which data are available: place of residence, age, sex, welfare status, and institutional status of beneficiaries. These factors account for much of the expected difference in health care reimbursements. They do not, however, account for differences in health status. Because of this, AAPCC calculations of expected costs may be too high if a selected group of beneficiaries is healthier than average, or too low if the selected group has a poorer health status than average. This case study examines the utilization behavior and reimbursement experience of a group of Medicare beneficiaries prior to their joining an HMO (during an open enrollment period) under a risk-sharing option. Their use was compared with a comparable Medicare population (the comparison group) to determine if their usage rates were greater, equal, or less than average. Results show that beneficiaries who joined during open enrollment had a rate of hospital inpatient use over 50 percent below the comparison group and a reimbursement rate for inpatient services 47 percent below the comparison group. These beneficiaries' use of Part B services also appears to be lower than the comparison group. These results must be interpreted with care. The information came from a single case study. Specific aspects of the open enrollment process, described in the paper, further limit the general liability of the findings. Also, while some studies of the same subject support the results, many others do not.
Insights
Medicare beneficiaries joining health maintenance organizations (HMOs) during open enrollment showed significantly lower utilization and reimbursement rates for inpatient and Part B services compared to a control group.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Health Economics
- Medicare Policy
Background:
- Medicare incentivizes Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) through risk-based payments tied to the Medicare Adjusted Average Per Capita Cost (AAPCC).
- AAPCC adjusts for demographic factors but does not account for beneficiaries' health status, potentially misaligning reimbursement with actual costs.
- This study investigates the pre-enrollment healthcare utilization and costs of Medicare beneficiaries joining an HMO under a risk-sharing option.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the utilization behavior and reimbursement experience of Medicare beneficiaries before enrolling in an HMO.
- To compare the healthcare usage and costs of these beneficiaries against a comparable Medicare population.
Main Methods:
- Case study analysis of Medicare beneficiaries during an open enrollment period.
- Comparison of utilization and reimbursement rates with a matched control group of Medicare beneficiaries.
Main Results:
- Beneficiaries joining the HMO demonstrated over 50% lower hospital inpatient utilization compared to the control group.
- Reimbursement rates for inpatient services were 47% lower for this group than the comparison population.
- Utilization of Part B services also appeared lower in the study group compared to controls.
Conclusions:
- The findings suggest that beneficiaries enrolling in HMOs during open enrollment may have lower healthcare utilization and costs than predicted by AAPCC.
- Results should be interpreted cautiously due to the single case study nature and specific enrollment process limitations.
- Further research is needed as findings are not consistently supported by other studies in the field.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Relative Risk
Odds Ratio
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Hazard Rate
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...
